CAJ | 학술논문

为了更好发挥《标准设计施工总承包招标文件》的通用合同条款作为总承包示范文本对我国建筑市场的规范、引导作用，采用比较研究方法对标准设计施工招标文件通用合同条款与 FIDIC 永久设备和设计-建造合同条件的合同结构进行细致而系统的对比研究，甄别出通用合同条款中与我国行业环境相适应的优越条款，重点分析了两者在承包人、监理人、风险分配和索赔等条款设置上的差异与相同之处，并对差异产生的原因做了简要分析，最后分析其不足之处。
위료경호발휘《표준설계시공총승포초표문건》적통용합동조관작위총승포시범문본대아국건축시장적규범、인도작용，채용비교연구방법대표준설계시공초표문건통용합동조관여 FIDIC 영구설비화설계-건조합동조건적합동결구진행세치이계통적대비연구，견별출통용합동조관중여아국행업배경상괄응적우월조관，중점분석료량자재승포인、감리인、풍험분배화색배등조관설치상적차이여상동지처，병대차이산생적원인주료간요분석，최후분석기불족지처。
In order to make the general contract conditions in the standard design-build bidding documents play a better role in regulating,guiding the construction market,the paper executes a detailed and systematic comparative study of contract structure between the general contract conditions in the standard design-build bidding documents and FIDIC plant and design-build conditions by the comparative study method,and distinguish perfect terms of the general contract conditions that adapt with Chinese industry environment. In addition,the paper analyzes the differences and similarities in terms of the contractor,supervision, risk allocation and claim,then does a brief analysis to the causes of the difference,and analyzes its deficiencies.