南方医科大学学报
南方醫科大學學報
남방의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2013年
12期
1823-1826
,共4页
黎明%吴锦瑜%徐冠军%张琴%陈志勇%刘珍花
黎明%吳錦瑜%徐冠軍%張琴%陳誌勇%劉珍花
려명%오금유%서관군%장금%진지용%류진화
肝炎,乙型,慢性%拉米夫定%阿德福韦酯%恩替卡韦%干扰素
肝炎,乙型,慢性%拉米伕定%阿德福韋酯%恩替卡韋%榦擾素
간염,을형,만성%랍미부정%아덕복위지%은체잡위%간우소
hepatitis B,chronic%lamivudine%adefovir dipivoxil%entecavir%interferon
目的:观察重组人干扰素α-2b(INFα-2b)单药治疗及恩替卡韦(ETV)与阿德福韦酯(ADV)联合治疗拉米夫定(LAM)与ADV联合治疗应答不佳的慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效和安全性。方法选择我院2008年6月~2011年1月LAM与ADV联合治疗应答不佳的慢性乙型肝炎患者161例,随机分为A、B两组,A组给予INFα-2b 5×106,每周3次;B组ETV(0.5 mg,1次/d)与ADV (10 mg,1次/d)联合应用。所有病例治疗48周为观察终点。采用化学发光法定量检测HBsAg和HBeAg,采用实时荧光定量PCR检测HBV DNA水平,采用PCR产物直接测序法检测病毒耐药基因。组间比较采用配对t检验,率的比较采用χ2检验。结果治疗48周,A组与B组患者血清HBV DNA水平中位数均明显下降,下降幅度分别为2.06±1.15log10拷贝/ml与1.77±1.28log10拷贝/ml;A组与B组血清病毒学应答率、血清学应答率、生化学应答率分别为:48.15%(39/81)与53.75%(43/80)、61.70%(50/81)与53.75%(43/80)、49.38%(40/81)与60.00%(48/80),两组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);基因耐药变异率分别为30.95%(13/42)与64.86%(24/37),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论LAM联合ADV治疗应答不佳的慢性乙型肝炎患者,选择改用INF或改用ETV与ADV联合治疗,均能获得较好的临床疗效。若患者无干扰素禁忌证,尽可能选择干扰素治疗。
目的:觀察重組人榦擾素α-2b(INFα-2b)單藥治療及恩替卡韋(ETV)與阿德福韋酯(ADV)聯閤治療拉米伕定(LAM)與ADV聯閤治療應答不佳的慢性乙型肝炎患者的療效和安全性。方法選擇我院2008年6月~2011年1月LAM與ADV聯閤治療應答不佳的慢性乙型肝炎患者161例,隨機分為A、B兩組,A組給予INFα-2b 5×106,每週3次;B組ETV(0.5 mg,1次/d)與ADV (10 mg,1次/d)聯閤應用。所有病例治療48週為觀察終點。採用化學髮光法定量檢測HBsAg和HBeAg,採用實時熒光定量PCR檢測HBV DNA水平,採用PCR產物直接測序法檢測病毒耐藥基因。組間比較採用配對t檢驗,率的比較採用χ2檢驗。結果治療48週,A組與B組患者血清HBV DNA水平中位數均明顯下降,下降幅度分彆為2.06±1.15log10拷貝/ml與1.77±1.28log10拷貝/ml;A組與B組血清病毒學應答率、血清學應答率、生化學應答率分彆為:48.15%(39/81)與53.75%(43/80)、61.70%(50/81)與53.75%(43/80)、49.38%(40/81)與60.00%(48/80),兩組間差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05);基因耐藥變異率分彆為30.95%(13/42)與64.86%(24/37),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論LAM聯閤ADV治療應答不佳的慢性乙型肝炎患者,選擇改用INF或改用ETV與ADV聯閤治療,均能穫得較好的臨床療效。若患者無榦擾素禁忌證,儘可能選擇榦擾素治療。
목적:관찰중조인간우소α-2b(INFα-2b)단약치료급은체잡위(ETV)여아덕복위지(ADV)연합치료랍미부정(LAM)여ADV연합치료응답불가적만성을형간염환자적료효화안전성。방법선택아원2008년6월~2011년1월LAM여ADV연합치료응답불가적만성을형간염환자161례,수궤분위A、B량조,A조급여INFα-2b 5×106,매주3차;B조ETV(0.5 mg,1차/d)여ADV (10 mg,1차/d)연합응용。소유병례치료48주위관찰종점。채용화학발광법정량검측HBsAg화HBeAg,채용실시형광정량PCR검측HBV DNA수평,채용PCR산물직접측서법검측병독내약기인。조간비교채용배대t검험,솔적비교채용χ2검험。결과치료48주,A조여B조환자혈청HBV DNA수평중위수균명현하강,하강폭도분별위2.06±1.15log10고패/ml여1.77±1.28log10고패/ml;A조여B조혈청병독학응답솔、혈청학응답솔、생화학응답솔분별위:48.15%(39/81)여53.75%(43/80)、61.70%(50/81)여53.75%(43/80)、49.38%(40/81)여60.00%(48/80),량조간차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05);기인내약변이솔분별위30.95%(13/42)여64.86%(24/37),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론LAM연합ADV치료응답불가적만성을형간염환자,선택개용INF혹개용ETV여ADV연합치료,균능획득교호적림상료효。약환자무간우소금기증,진가능선택간우소치료。
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human interferon α-2b (INFα-2b) monotherapy and combined therapy with entecavir (ETV) plus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in chronic hepatitis B patients with poor response to combined therapy with lamivudine and ADV. Methods A total of 161 patients with chronic hepatitis B refractory to to combined therapy with lamivudine (LAM) and ADV were randomized to receive INFα-2b monotherapy (5 × 106, three times a week) (group A) or combined therapy with entecavir (0.5 mg/day) plus adefovir (10 mg/day) (group B). Serum levels of HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV viral load were analyzed at 48 weeks using chemiluminescence assay and by real-time PCR as appropriate. The drug resistance genes in HBV was tested by direct DNA sequencing. Results At 48 weeks of treatment, HBV DNA decreased significantly in groups A and B to 2.06 ± 1.15log10 copies/ml and 1.77 ± 1.28log10 copies/ml, respectively. The rates of viral response, serological response, and biochemical response in groups A and B were 48.15%(39/81) vs 53.75%(43/80), 61.70%(50/81) vs 53.75%(43/80), and 49.38%(40/81) vs 60.00%(48/80), showing no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The drug resistance gene mutation rate was significanty higher in group B (64.86%, 24/37) than in group A (30.95%, 13/42, P<0.05). Conclusions Chronic hepatitis B patients refractory to lamivudine combined with ADV have a good response to INFα-2b monotherapy and combined therapy with entecavir and ADV , and interferon treatment is preferred to reduce potential drug resistance gene mutations.