CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察电针神经刺激疗法治疗尿道综合征的临床疗效。方法：将尿道综合征患者86例随机分为观察组和对照组各43例。观察组采用“腹四穴”和“骶四穴”电针神经刺激治疗；对照组口服舍尼亭治疗，2个疗程后观察疗效。结果：2组患者治疗后症状积分及生活质量积分与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）；2组患者治疗后症状改善率比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）；2组患者治疗后生活质量改善率比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：电针神经刺激疗法治疗尿道综合征疗效优于舍尼亭。
목적：관찰전침신경자격요법치료뇨도종합정적림상료효。방법：장뇨도종합정환자86례수궤분위관찰조화대조조각43례。관찰조채용“복사혈”화“저사혈”전침신경자격치료；대조조구복사니정치료，2개료정후관찰료효。결과：2조환자치료후증상적분급생활질량적분여치료전비교차이유통계학의의（P＜0.01）；2조환자치료후증상개선솔비교차이유통계학의의（P＜0.01）；2조환자치료후생활질량개선솔비교차이무통계학의의（P＞0.05）。결론：전침신경자격요법치료뇨도종합정료효우우사니정。
Objective:To survey curative effects of electroacupuncture nerve stimulation therapy in the treat-ment for urethral syndrome. Methods:Altogether 86 patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. The observation group received electroacupuncture nerve stimulation therapy at"four acupoints around the abdomen"and"four acupoints around the sacrum";the control group took tolterodine tartrate tablets oral-ly, curative effects of both groups were observed after two courses of the treatment. Results:The difference had sta-tistical meaning when the patients in both groups after treating were compared with them before treating in symptom scale and the scales of life quality (P<0.01);the difference showed statistical meaning in symptom improvement rate after treating between both groups (P<0.01);there was insignificant difference in life quality improvement rate between both groups after treating (P>0.05). Conclusion:Curative effects of electroacupuncture nerve stimulation therapy are superior to these of tolterodine tartrate tablets in treating urethral syndrome.