中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2014年
27期
138-140,141
,共4页
老年骨质疏松%胸腰椎压骨折%中西医综合疗法治疗
老年骨質疏鬆%胸腰椎壓骨摺%中西醫綜閤療法治療
노년골질소송%흉요추압골절%중서의종합요법치료
Senile osteoporosis%Thoracolumbar compression fractures%Chinese and western medicine therapy
目的：探析老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折采用中西医综合疗法的治疗效果及其应用价值。方法：选取于2012年6月-2013年6月本院骨科收治的156例老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎压骨折患者的临床资料进行分析。按治疗方法不同将患者分为两组，其中试验组90例运用中西医综合疗法治疗，对照组66例单纯应用西医治疗。比较两组患者治疗前后骨密度、治疗效果、患者满意度等情况。结果：试验组治疗前骨密度（-3.32±0.52），治疗后（-1.01±0.08）；总有效率100%，治疗满意率100%。对照组治疗前骨密度（-3.19±0.60），治疗后（-1.45±0.12）；总有效率78.79%（52/66），治疗满意率75.76%（50/66）。治疗后，试验组的骨密度、治疗效果、患者满意度均明显好于对照组（P<0.05）。结论：中西医综合治疗能够显著提高治疗效果。西医通过手术方法能够在短时间内恢复骨折部位，而结合中医方法能够显著提高骨密度，从根本上杜绝骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折，标本兼治，值得推广。
目的：探析老年骨質疏鬆性胸腰椎壓縮性骨摺採用中西醫綜閤療法的治療效果及其應用價值。方法：選取于2012年6月-2013年6月本院骨科收治的156例老年骨質疏鬆性胸腰椎壓骨摺患者的臨床資料進行分析。按治療方法不同將患者分為兩組，其中試驗組90例運用中西醫綜閤療法治療，對照組66例單純應用西醫治療。比較兩組患者治療前後骨密度、治療效果、患者滿意度等情況。結果：試驗組治療前骨密度（-3.32±0.52），治療後（-1.01±0.08）；總有效率100%，治療滿意率100%。對照組治療前骨密度（-3.19±0.60），治療後（-1.45±0.12）；總有效率78.79%（52/66），治療滿意率75.76%（50/66）。治療後，試驗組的骨密度、治療效果、患者滿意度均明顯好于對照組（P<0.05）。結論：中西醫綜閤治療能夠顯著提高治療效果。西醫通過手術方法能夠在短時間內恢複骨摺部位，而結閤中醫方法能夠顯著提高骨密度，從根本上杜絕骨質疏鬆性胸腰椎壓縮性骨摺，標本兼治，值得推廣。
목적：탐석노년골질소송성흉요추압축성골절채용중서의종합요법적치료효과급기응용개치。방법：선취우2012년6월-2013년6월본원골과수치적156례노년골질소송성흉요추압골절환자적림상자료진행분석。안치료방법불동장환자분위량조，기중시험조90례운용중서의종합요법치료，대조조66례단순응용서의치료。비교량조환자치료전후골밀도、치료효과、환자만의도등정황。결과：시험조치료전골밀도（-3.32±0.52），치료후（-1.01±0.08）；총유효솔100%，치료만의솔100%。대조조치료전골밀도（-3.19±0.60），치료후（-1.45±0.12）；총유효솔78.79%（52/66），치료만의솔75.76%（50/66）。치료후，시험조적골밀도、치료효과、환자만의도균명현호우대조조（P<0.05）。결론：중서의종합치료능구현저제고치료효과。서의통과수술방법능구재단시간내회복골절부위，이결합중의방법능구현저제고골밀도，종근본상두절골질소송성흉요추압축성골절，표본겸치，치득추엄。
Objective:To explore the therapeutic effect and its application value of Chinese and western medicine therapy on elderly osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures.Method:The clinical data of 156 cases of senile osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures in our hospital from June 2012 to June 2013 were analyzed. They were divided into two groups according to the different treatment methods. The experimental group(n=90)was treated with Chinese and western medicine treatment;the control group(n=66)only used western medicine treatment method. Before and after treatment,bone mineral density,treatment effect,patient satisfaction,and so on of the two groups were compared.Result:Before treatment,the experimental group’bone mineral density was(-3.32±0.52),and after treatment was(-1.01±0.08);effective rate was 100%,treatment satisfaction rate was 100%. Before treatment, bone mineral density of the control group was(-3.19±0.60),after treatment was(-1.45±0.12);the effective rate was 78.79%(52/66),treatment satisfaction rate was 75.76%(50/66).The bone mineral density,treatment effect and patient satisfaction of the experimental group were much better than the control group after treatment(P<0.05). Conclusion:Chinese and western medicine treatment can significantly improve the therapeutic effect. Western medicine through the operation method can restore fracture in a short time,and combine traditional Chinese medicine can significantly increase bone density,and fundamentally eliminate osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures,worthy of promotion.
