CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨生理性海水应用于鼻腔术后患者的临床观察。方法：选取2012年1月-2014年3月本院进行鼻腔手术的患者90例，按随机数字表法分为两组各45例。对照组采用鼻腔冲洗器用生理盐水冲洗鼻腔，观察组采用美林康博生理性海水冲洗鼻腔。比较两组术后患者的恢复情况。结果：对照组和观察组治愈率分别为66.7%、84.4%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组有效率为95.6%高于对照组的89.0%。结论：与传统的生理盐水鼻腔冲洗相比，生理性海水冲洗提高了治愈率，见效快，效果好，方便适用，值得临床推广使用。
목적：탐토생이성해수응용우비강술후환자적림상관찰。방법：선취2012년1월-2014년3월본원진행비강수술적환자90례，안수궤수자표법분위량조각45례。대조조채용비강충세기용생리염수충세비강，관찰조채용미림강박생이성해수충세비강。비교량조술후환자적회복정황。결과：대조조화관찰조치유솔분별위66.7%、84.4%，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。관찰조유효솔위95.6%고우대조조적89.0%。결론：여전통적생리염수비강충세상비，생이성해수충세제고료치유솔，견효쾌，효과호，방편괄용，치득림상추엄사용。
Objective:To investigate the clinic observation of physiological sea water treating for patients after nasal surgery.Method:90 cases of nasal surgery in our hospital from January 2012 to March 2014 were selected,they were randomly divided into two groups for 45 cases. The control group was treated with physiological saline nasal cavity irrigation,the observation group was treated with physiological sea water nasal cavity irrigation. The effect of the two groups was compared.Result:The cure rate of the observation group was 84.4%,the control group was 66.7%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The efficiency of the observation group(95.6%)was higher than the control group (89.0%).Conclusion:The application of physiological sea water improves the cure rate with good and rapid effect. It’s easy to apply and worthy of clinical application.