中国血吸虫病防治杂志
中國血吸蟲病防治雜誌
중국혈흡충병방치잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SCHISTOSOMIASIS CONTROL
2014年
3期
265-269
,共5页
刘汉成%钟晨晖%徐春梅%刘先国%孙华山%黄希富%李作均%廖昌军%杨军晶%刘建兵%范宏萍
劉漢成%鐘晨暉%徐春梅%劉先國%孫華山%黃希富%李作均%廖昌軍%楊軍晶%劉建兵%範宏萍
류한성%종신휘%서춘매%류선국%손화산%황희부%리작균%료창군%양군정%류건병%범굉평
钉螺%杀螺剂%螺威%四聚?杀螺胺%氯硝柳胺
釘螺%殺螺劑%螺威%四聚?殺螺胺%氯硝柳胺
정라%살라제%라위%사취?살라알%록초류알
Oncomelania hupensis%Molluscicide%“Luo-wei”(TDS)%Metaldehyde and niclosamide(MNSC)%Niclosamide
目的:比较螺威(TDS)和四聚?杀螺胺(MNSC)的现场杀螺效果。方法选择有钉螺孳生的小型有螺沟渠环境为试区,分别采用浸杀法和喷洒法对TDS和MNSC的杀螺效果进行评价。TDS和MNSC浸杀试验浓度分别为2.5 g/m3和2 ml/m3,喷洒试验剂量分别为3 g/m2和2 ml/m2;设50%氯硝柳胺乙醇胺盐可湿性粉剂(WPN)为对照组,浸杀浓度和喷洒剂量为2 g/m3和2 ml/m2。结果 TDS浸杀24 h钉螺死亡率为90.70%,喷洒7 d死亡率为81.40%,各观察时点杀螺效果差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。喷洒后1 d ,TDS组钉螺死亡率低于MNSC组(P<0.01),喷洒3 d后两组死亡率相近(P>0.05)。MN-SC浸杀24 h钉螺死亡率为99.17%,喷洒1 d为66.07%;WPN浸杀24 h钉螺死亡率为97.51%,喷洒1 d为71.43%,两者差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论 TDS具有良好的杀螺活性和药效稳定性,现场杀螺效果与MNSC相近,但杀螺敏感性低于MNSC。
目的:比較螺威(TDS)和四聚?殺螺胺(MNSC)的現場殺螺效果。方法選擇有釘螺孳生的小型有螺溝渠環境為試區,分彆採用浸殺法和噴灑法對TDS和MNSC的殺螺效果進行評價。TDS和MNSC浸殺試驗濃度分彆為2.5 g/m3和2 ml/m3,噴灑試驗劑量分彆為3 g/m2和2 ml/m2;設50%氯硝柳胺乙醇胺鹽可濕性粉劑(WPN)為對照組,浸殺濃度和噴灑劑量為2 g/m3和2 ml/m2。結果 TDS浸殺24 h釘螺死亡率為90.70%,噴灑7 d死亡率為81.40%,各觀察時點殺螺效果差異均無統計學意義(P均>0.05)。噴灑後1 d ,TDS組釘螺死亡率低于MNSC組(P<0.01),噴灑3 d後兩組死亡率相近(P>0.05)。MN-SC浸殺24 h釘螺死亡率為99.17%,噴灑1 d為66.07%;WPN浸殺24 h釘螺死亡率為97.51%,噴灑1 d為71.43%,兩者差異均無統計學意義(P均>0.05)。結論 TDS具有良好的殺螺活性和藥效穩定性,現場殺螺效果與MNSC相近,但殺螺敏感性低于MNSC。
목적:비교라위(TDS)화사취?살라알(MNSC)적현장살라효과。방법선택유정라자생적소형유라구거배경위시구,분별채용침살법화분쇄법대TDS화MNSC적살라효과진행평개。TDS화MNSC침살시험농도분별위2.5 g/m3화2 ml/m3,분쇄시험제량분별위3 g/m2화2 ml/m2;설50%록초류알을순알염가습성분제(WPN)위대조조,침살농도화분쇄제량위2 g/m3화2 ml/m2。결과 TDS침살24 h정라사망솔위90.70%,분쇄7 d사망솔위81.40%,각관찰시점살라효과차이균무통계학의의(P균>0.05)。분쇄후1 d ,TDS조정라사망솔저우MNSC조(P<0.01),분쇄3 d후량조사망솔상근(P>0.05)。MN-SC침살24 h정라사망솔위99.17%,분쇄1 d위66.07%;WPN침살24 h정라사망솔위97.51%,분쇄1 d위71.43%,량자차이균무통계학의의(P균>0.05)。결론 TDS구유량호적살라활성화약효은정성,현장살라효과여MNSC상근,단살라민감성저우MNSC。
Objective To compare the molluscicidal effects between“Luo-wei”(TDS),a plant molluscicide in 4 percent, and metaldehyde and niclosamide(MNSC)in the field. Methods A natural ecological environment with Oncomelania hupensis was selected as the test area,the test concentrations of TDS and MNSC were 2.5 g/m3 and 2 ml/m3 respectively by the immersion method;the test doses of TDS and MNSC were 3 g/m2 and 2 ml/m2 respectively by the spray method;the doses of WPN in a control group were 2 g/m3 and 2 g/m2 respectively by the two methods above-mentioned. The molluscicidal effects between TDS and MNSC were compared by using the synchronous design method and parallel comparative method. Results In the TDS group,the death rate of snails was 90.70%by immersion for 24 hours,reached to 81.40%after spraying for 7 days,and there were no significant differences among the observation time points in molluscicidal effects(P>0.05). One day after the spraying,the death rate of snails was less in the TDS group compared with that in the MSCN group(P<0.01),but the death rates of snails were similar in both groups 3 days after the spraying(P>0.05). In the MSCN group,the death rate of snails was 99.17%by immersion for 24 hours,reached to 66.07% by spraying for 1 day. In the WPS group,the death rate of snails was 97.15% by immersion for 24 hours,reached to 71.43%after spraying for 1 day,and there were no significant differences(both P>0.05). Conclusion TDS has a good molluscicidal activity and stable efficacy,and the molluscicidal effect of TDS is similar to that of MSCN in the filed, but the molluscicidal sensitivity of TDS is lower than that of MSCN.