安徽农学通报
安徽農學通報
안휘농학통보
AUHUI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE BULLETIN
2012年
9期
175-178
,共4页
李文波%高如承%潘辉%陈志
李文波%高如承%潘輝%陳誌
리문파%고여승%반휘%진지
:西施舌%饵料%消化酶
:西施舌%餌料%消化酶
:서시설%이료%소화매
Juvenile of Coelomactra antiquata%Diets%Digestive enzymes
将壳长6.60±0.03mm的西施舌稚贝随机分为3组,每组投喂不同饵料,分别为藻类(XZ组)、配合饲料(XL组)和藻类与配合饲料的混合饵料(XH组),各设3个平行,20d后测定各组稚贝生长指标、消化酶活性以研究不同饵料对稚贝生长、消化功能的影响。结果:西施舌成活率在88.2%-96.6%。稚贝壳长增量各组间差异显著(P〈0.05),壳长平均增量XH组〉XZ组〉XL组。不同饵料组对西施舌体重影响不显著(P〉0.05)。不同饵料对西施舌稚贝蛋白酶、淀粉酶、纤维素酶和脂肪酶活性都有显著影响(P〈0.05)。蛋白酶和淀粉酶比活力XH组〉XL组〉XZ组;纤维素酶比活力XZ组〉XH组〉XL组;脂肪酶比活力xL组〉XH组〉XZ组。
將殼長6.60±0.03mm的西施舌稚貝隨機分為3組,每組投餵不同餌料,分彆為藻類(XZ組)、配閤飼料(XL組)和藻類與配閤飼料的混閤餌料(XH組),各設3箇平行,20d後測定各組稚貝生長指標、消化酶活性以研究不同餌料對稚貝生長、消化功能的影響。結果:西施舌成活率在88.2%-96.6%。稚貝殼長增量各組間差異顯著(P〈0.05),殼長平均增量XH組〉XZ組〉XL組。不同餌料組對西施舌體重影響不顯著(P〉0.05)。不同餌料對西施舌稚貝蛋白酶、澱粉酶、纖維素酶和脂肪酶活性都有顯著影響(P〈0.05)。蛋白酶和澱粉酶比活力XH組〉XL組〉XZ組;纖維素酶比活力XZ組〉XH組〉XL組;脂肪酶比活力xL組〉XH組〉XZ組。
장각장6.60±0.03mm적서시설치패수궤분위3조,매조투위불동이료,분별위조류(XZ조)、배합사료(XL조)화조류여배합사료적혼합이료(XH조),각설3개평행,20d후측정각조치패생장지표、소화매활성이연구불동이료대치패생장、소화공능적영향。결과:서시설성활솔재88.2%-96.6%。치패각장증량각조간차이현저(P〈0.05),각장평균증량XH조〉XZ조〉XL조。불동이료조대서시설체중영향불현저(P〉0.05)。불동이료대서시설치패단백매、정분매、섬유소매화지방매활성도유현저영향(P〈0.05)。단백매화정분매비활력XH조〉XL조〉XZ조;섬유소매비활력XZ조〉XH조〉XL조;지방매비활력xL조〉XH조〉XZ조。
A 20 days feeding trial was conducted to evaluate effect of different diets on growth performance and digestive en- zyme activities of juvenile Coelomactra antiquate. The juveniles 6. 60±0. 03mm were fed with Algae (Group_XZ) , formu- lated diet ( Group_ XL) ,and Group _XH was fed with Algae and formulated diet. The results showed: The survival rate of the juvenile C. antiquata was between 88.2% and 96. 6% in the treatments. The increment of shell length were found to be significantly different ( P 〈 0. 05 ) among the three groups, and Group _XH 〉 Group_XZ 〉 Group_ XL. The increment of weight were found to be not significantly different ( P 〉 0. 05 ) among the three groups, proteinase activities,amylase activi- ties,eelluase activities,lipase activities was were found to be significantly different ( P 〈 0. 05 ) among the three groups. The tendency of proteinase activities and amylase activities was Group _XH 〉 Group_ XL 〉 Group XZ; The tendency of celluase activities was Group XZ 〉 Group _XH 〉 Group_ XL ; The tendency of lipase activities was Group_ XL 〉 Group _XH 〉 Group_XZ.