中南大学学报(医学版)
中南大學學報(醫學版)
중남대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCES)
2013年
7期
695-698
,共4页
奚健%丁锡平%彭泽峰%刘庆%袁贤瑞
奚健%丁錫平%彭澤峰%劉慶%袁賢瑞
해건%정석평%팽택봉%류경%원현서
岩上静脉%听神经瘤%小脑出血
巖上靜脈%聽神經瘤%小腦齣血
암상정맥%은신경류%소뇌출혈
superior petrosal vein%acoustic neuroma%cerebellar hemorrhage
目的:探讨岩上静脉(superior petrosal vein,SPV)保护在听神经瘤显微手术中的临床意义。方法:以2009年1月至2011年7月施行的听神经瘤显微手术共149例患者为观察对象,回顾性分析岩上静脉未保留(superior petrosal vein without protection,SPVWP)患者( SPVWP组,n=8)和岩上静脉保留(superior petrosal vein protection,SPVP)患者( SPVP组,n=141)术后发生术区血肿、小脑血肿和小脑水肿的差异。结果:149例患者中岩上静脉保留完整141例,未保留8例。8例SPVWP患者术后发生术区血肿4例,小脑水肿5例,小脑出血3例。141例SPVP患者术后发生术区血肿40例,小脑水肿56例,小脑出血12例。统计分析SPVWP组和SPVP组小脑出血的发生率差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.84,P=0.05);术区血肿的发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.646,P=0.422);小脑水肿的发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.611,P=0.434)。结论:在听神经瘤手术中,应尽可能对岩上静脉进行良好的保护,保护岩上静脉可能减少小脑出血的发生概率。
目的:探討巖上靜脈(superior petrosal vein,SPV)保護在聽神經瘤顯微手術中的臨床意義。方法:以2009年1月至2011年7月施行的聽神經瘤顯微手術共149例患者為觀察對象,迴顧性分析巖上靜脈未保留(superior petrosal vein without protection,SPVWP)患者( SPVWP組,n=8)和巖上靜脈保留(superior petrosal vein protection,SPVP)患者( SPVP組,n=141)術後髮生術區血腫、小腦血腫和小腦水腫的差異。結果:149例患者中巖上靜脈保留完整141例,未保留8例。8例SPVWP患者術後髮生術區血腫4例,小腦水腫5例,小腦齣血3例。141例SPVP患者術後髮生術區血腫40例,小腦水腫56例,小腦齣血12例。統計分析SPVWP組和SPVP組小腦齣血的髮生率差異有統計學意義(χ2=3.84,P=0.05);術區血腫的髮生率差異無統計學意義(χ2=0.646,P=0.422);小腦水腫的髮生率差異無統計學意義(χ2=0.611,P=0.434)。結論:在聽神經瘤手術中,應儘可能對巖上靜脈進行良好的保護,保護巖上靜脈可能減少小腦齣血的髮生概率。
목적:탐토암상정맥(superior petrosal vein,SPV)보호재은신경류현미수술중적림상의의。방법:이2009년1월지2011년7월시행적은신경류현미수술공149례환자위관찰대상,회고성분석암상정맥미보류(superior petrosal vein without protection,SPVWP)환자( SPVWP조,n=8)화암상정맥보류(superior petrosal vein protection,SPVP)환자( SPVP조,n=141)술후발생술구혈종、소뇌혈종화소뇌수종적차이。결과:149례환자중암상정맥보류완정141례,미보류8례。8례SPVWP환자술후발생술구혈종4례,소뇌수종5례,소뇌출혈3례。141례SPVP환자술후발생술구혈종40례,소뇌수종56례,소뇌출혈12례。통계분석SPVWP조화SPVP조소뇌출혈적발생솔차이유통계학의의(χ2=3.84,P=0.05);술구혈종적발생솔차이무통계학의의(χ2=0.646,P=0.422);소뇌수종적발생솔차이무통계학의의(χ2=0.611,P=0.434)。결론:재은신경류수술중,응진가능대암상정맥진행량호적보호,보호암상정맥가능감소소뇌출혈적발생개솔。
Objective:To explore the clinical signiifcance of the protection of superior petrosal vein (SPV) in the microneurosurgery for acoustic neuroma. Methods:From January 2009 to July 2011, 149 cases of acoustic neuroma microsurgery were observed. hTe difference in hematoma in surgical area, cerebellar hematoma and cerebellar edema were compared between a SPV without protection group (SPVWP group, n=8) and a SPV protection group (SPVP group, n=141). Results:In the 149 patients with acoustic neuroma, the SPV was reserved in 141 patients. In the SPVWP group (8 patients), hematoma in the surgery area occurred in 4 patients, cerebellar edema in 5, and cerebellar hemorrhage in 3. In the SPVP group (141 patients), hematoma in the surgery area occurred in 40 patients, cerebellar edema in 56, and cerebellar hemorrhage in 12. hTere was signiifcant difference in the incidence of cerebellar hemorrhage (χ2=3.84, P=0.05), no signiifcant difference in the incidence of hematoma in the surgical area (χ2=0.646, respectively, P=0.422), and no significant difference in the incidence of cerebellar edema (χ2=0.611, P=0.434) between the SPVWP group and the SPVP group. Conclusion:In acoustic neuroma surgery, the SPV should be protected, which may reduce the risk of cerebellar hemorrhage.