CAJ | 학술논문

国际环境公约的有效性包括减排有效性与社会福利有效性两个方面，强调一个有效的国际环境公约在减排的前提下提高社会福利的功能。然而，基于Carraro＆Siniscalco 1993和Hoel 1992的同时博弈模型，本文发现全合作是有效的却是不稳定的。将他们的模型拓展为无限期的重复博弈后，发现基于远期收益考虑的情况之下，一个全合作的国际环境公约是可以被子博弈完美均衡所支持的。另外，在证明中，本文也给出了折现因子的下界。
국제배경공약적유효성포괄감배유효성여사회복리유효성량개방면，강조일개유효적국제배경공약재감배적전제하제고사회복리적공능。연이，기우Carraro＆Siniscalco 1993화Hoel 1992적동시박혁모형，본문발현전합작시유효적각시불은정적。장타문적모형탁전위무한기적중복박혁후，발현기우원기수익고필적정황지하，일개전합작적국제배경공약시가이피자박혁완미균형소지지적。령외，재증명중，본문야급출료절현인자적하계。
In this paper, the efficiency of International Environmental Agreements (IEAs)is defined in terms of emission reducing and maximizing joint social welfare .It emphasizes IEAs’ improvement on the social welfare without increasing the pollution.For the simultaneous model in Carraro & Siniscalco (1993)and Hoel(1992), we show that the outcome of full cooperation is efficient but not stable .When the benchmark model is extended to infinitely repeated game, we show that full cooperation is supported by subgame perfect equilibrium .And, the lower bound of the discount factor is also provided .