CAJ | 학술논문

论文以CSSCI图书情报领域的18种期刊为例，以这些期刊在2009年全年登载论文的参考文献为研究对象，从CSSCI数据库中获取数据，统计分析各期刊的引用认同。结果显示：期刊引用认同指标（引文量、篇均引文量、英文引文比、期刊引用广度、自施引率、引用半衰期、期刊集中因子、认同期刊影响力等指标）与CSSCI来源期刊定量与定性评价指标并不明显相关，但这类指标可以反映期刊载文的内容特征与偏好、对国外科学文献和对其他学科文献的利用程度、期刊的办刊定位、学科的发展模式等等，在综合评价期刊方面具有一定意义。表3。参考文献27。
논문이CSSCI도서정보영역적18충기간위례，이저사기간재2009년전년등재논문적삼고문헌위연구대상，종CSSCI수거고중획취수거，통계분석각기간적인용인동。결과현시：기간인용인동지표（인문량、편균인문량、영문인문비、기간인용엄도、자시인솔、인용반쇠기、기간집중인자、인동기간영향력등지표）여CSSCI래원기간정량여정성평개지표병불명현상관，단저류지표가이반영기간재문적내용특정여편호、대국외과학문헌화대기타학과문헌적이용정도、기간적판간정위、학과적발전모식등등，재종합평개기간방면구유일정의의。표3。삼고문헌27。
This paper analyses journal citation identity based on data from 18 LIS journals included in CSSCI in 2009. The results showed that Journal Citation Identity indicators including Reference Count, Reference Count per Arti- cle, Percentage of English References, Self-citing Rate, Extensiveness of References, Citing Half Life, Journal Concentra-tion Factor, and Average JIF of Citation Identities, are not significantly correlated to the evaluation of journal impact. This paper argues that Journal Citation Identity indicators can reveal the content features of journal articles, editors＇ preferences of research topics, and even the development trends of the LIS field. 3 tabs. 27 refs.