口腔材料器械杂志
口腔材料器械雜誌
구강재료기계잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF DENTAL MATERIALS AND DEVICES
2014年
2期
93-96
,共4页
复合树脂%表面粗糙度%润湿性%抛光材料%粒度
複閤樹脂%錶麵粗糙度%潤濕性%拋光材料%粒度
복합수지%표면조조도%윤습성%포광재료%립도
Composite resin%Surface roughness%Wettability%Polishing materials%Grits
目的:比较抛光材料的粒度对3种复合树脂粗糙度及表面润湿性的影响。方法选择3种复合树脂材料,分别为Filtek Z100(A组),Charisma(B组)和Clearfil AP-X(C组),采用不同粒度的抛光材料(Sof-LexTM Extra Thin抛光彩碟),随机分组抛光,然后,检测表面粗糙度(Ra)及接触角,并进行统计学分析。结果随抛光彩碟粒度减小,3种材料的Ra值均逐渐减小,精细粒度抛光组的接触角显著低于3个较粗粒度抛光组(P<0.05);3种材料在相同抛光材料粒度处理后,Ra显著不同(P<0.05):A组<B组<C组,同时,A组的接触角明显高于B组和C组(P<0.05)。结论复合树脂的表面粗糙度及润湿性与材料种类和抛光材料的粒度相关。
目的:比較拋光材料的粒度對3種複閤樹脂粗糙度及錶麵潤濕性的影響。方法選擇3種複閤樹脂材料,分彆為Filtek Z100(A組),Charisma(B組)和Clearfil AP-X(C組),採用不同粒度的拋光材料(Sof-LexTM Extra Thin拋光綵碟),隨機分組拋光,然後,檢測錶麵粗糙度(Ra)及接觸角,併進行統計學分析。結果隨拋光綵碟粒度減小,3種材料的Ra值均逐漸減小,精細粒度拋光組的接觸角顯著低于3箇較粗粒度拋光組(P<0.05);3種材料在相同拋光材料粒度處理後,Ra顯著不同(P<0.05):A組<B組<C組,同時,A組的接觸角明顯高于B組和C組(P<0.05)。結論複閤樹脂的錶麵粗糙度及潤濕性與材料種類和拋光材料的粒度相關。
목적:비교포광재료적립도대3충복합수지조조도급표면윤습성적영향。방법선택3충복합수지재료,분별위Filtek Z100(A조),Charisma(B조)화Clearfil AP-X(C조),채용불동립도적포광재료(Sof-LexTM Extra Thin포광채설),수궤분조포광,연후,검측표면조조도(Ra)급접촉각,병진행통계학분석。결과수포광채설립도감소,3충재료적Ra치균축점감소,정세립도포광조적접촉각현저저우3개교조립도포광조(P<0.05);3충재료재상동포광재료립도처리후,Ra현저불동(P<0.05):A조<B조<C조,동시,A조적접촉각명현고우B조화C조(P<0.05)。결론복합수지적표면조조도급윤습성여재료충류화포광재료적립도상관。
Objective To compare the effects of polishing grits on surface roughness and wettability of three composite resin materials. Methods After Filtek Z100(3M ESPE, America)(group A), Charisma(Her-aes Kulzer, Germany)(group B)and Clearfil AP-X(Kurary, Japan)(group C)cured, these samples were divided into 4 groups to be polished with different polishing grits discs(Sof-LexTM Extra Thin (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, Amaerica)) at random. Then, surface roughness and contact angle were determined with profilometer and con-tact angle measurement. At last, data were analyzed and compared by SPSS. Results Ra values of three materials gradually decreased with the decrease of polishing grits size, The super fine group (SF) showed the lowest contact angle value than the other coarse grit groups (P<0.05). Using the same polishing grits, Ra values were different ac-cording to materials (P<0.05):group A<group B<group C. Meanwhile, group A had higher contact angle value than group B and group C (P<0.05). Conclusions Surface roughness and contace angle of composite resin materi-als were influenced by the grits size of polishing materials.