CAJ | 학술논문

语境论、“具体问题具体分析”或者理论联系实际等论证方法的过度运用令人生疑。一是在把握事实方面，自己树立一个假想的靶子进行批判，而三段论的演绎推理或者分析，或因假设前提错误，或因不存在因果关联，而导致结果不能证；二是教条的、无原则的具体分析，借题发挥的普遍联系，因为多走了一步，真理就转化成了谬误。为方法而方法、为批判而批判可能是一种舍本逐末的研究思路。而“对象即方法”的研究思路可能是法官事实认定的心理学分析的一个基本前提。
어경론、“구체문제구체분석”혹자이론련계실제등론증방법적과도운용령인생의。일시재파악사실방면，자기수립일개가상적파자진행비판，이삼단론적연역추리혹자분석，혹인가설전제착오，혹인불존재인과관련，이도치결과불능증；이시교조적、무원칙적구체분석，차제발휘적보편련계，인위다주료일보，진리취전화성료류오。위방법이방법、위비판이비판가능시일충사본축말적연구사로。이“대상즉방법”적연구사로가능시법관사실인정적심이학분석적일개기본전제。
It is suspicious to over emphasize the importance of certain reasoning methods such as context theory, concrete analyses on speciifc issues, or applying theories to real-life situations. On one hand, in terms of grasping the fact, an imaginary target set up by oneself for criticism will lead to the improvable result because of error or inexistence of assumptions or because of no causal relationship in the syllogism analysis or deductive reasoning; On the other hand, due to dogmatic, unreasonable concrete analysis and extremely widespread digression from the universal relation, it simply goes too far, which leads the truth being converted into fallacy. Method for method and criticism for criticism tends to become a research approach merely for formality. The research approach of emphasizing“object as method”is likely to be a fundamental prerequisite for psychological analysis in judge’s fact-ifndings.