中南大学学报(社会科学版)
中南大學學報(社會科學版)
중남대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE)
2014年
3期
120-126
,共7页
不当得利%返还请求权%行政主体%公法
不噹得利%返還請求權%行政主體%公法
불당득리%반환청구권%행정주체%공법
unjust enrichment%the power on restitution of unjust enrichment%administrative organization%public law
在当今给付行政时代,行政相对人从行政主体处获得不当得利的情形已大量出现。行政主体如何追索这些不当得利,我国大陆立法上并无明确规定,理论上的探讨也较少。参酌域外公法上返还请求权制度,在有授权的情况下,行政主体可以凭借自身的公权力直接对行政相对人采取强制返还措施。否则,应当通过诉讼获得返还。不过,基于信赖保护原则、衡平法理和时效等因素,行政主体的不当得利返还请求权应受到一定程度的限制。
在噹今給付行政時代,行政相對人從行政主體處穫得不噹得利的情形已大量齣現。行政主體如何追索這些不噹得利,我國大陸立法上併無明確規定,理論上的探討也較少。參酌域外公法上返還請求權製度,在有授權的情況下,行政主體可以憑藉自身的公權力直接對行政相對人採取彊製返還措施。否則,應噹通過訴訟穫得返還。不過,基于信賴保護原則、衡平法理和時效等因素,行政主體的不噹得利返還請求權應受到一定程度的限製。
재당금급부행정시대,행정상대인종행정주체처획득불당득리적정형이대량출현。행정주체여하추색저사불당득리,아국대륙입법상병무명학규정,이론상적탐토야교소。삼작역외공법상반환청구권제도,재유수권적정황하,행정주체가이빙차자신적공권력직접대행정상대인채취강제반환조시。부칙,응당통과소송획득반환。불과,기우신뢰보호원칙、형평법리화시효등인소,행정주체적불당득리반환청구권응수도일정정도적한제。
In the era of benefit administration, the phenomenon that administrative counterparts get unjust enrichment from administrative organizations emerges in large numbers. About how the ministrative organizations to recover these unjust enrichment, it is not explicitly stated in our legislation, and there are few papers in this regard. Considering the system on restitution of unjust enrichment from Germany, Japan and Taiwan, in the cases that administrative organizations are expressly or impliedly authorized by law, measures can be taken to force administrative counterparts returning the unjust enrichment; otherwise they can only sue. Meanwhile the power of forcing administrative counterparts returning the unjust enrichment must be restricted to a certain extent because of many causes, such as the trust protection principle, the balance theory and time limit.