贵州农业科学
貴州農業科學
귀주농업과학
GUIZHOU AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
2014年
5期
180-183
,共4页
池馨%刘济明%颜强%李鹏%爱华%高攀
池馨%劉濟明%顏彊%李鵬%愛華%高攀
지형%류제명%안강%리붕%애화%고반
小蓬竹%重要值%生态位宽度%生态位相似性比例
小蓬竹%重要值%生態位寬度%生態位相似性比例
소봉죽%중요치%생태위관도%생태위상사성비례
Drepanostachyumluodianense%important value%niche breadth%niche similarity proportion
为小蓬竹引种栽培提供指导依据,通过样方法对贵州罗甸、平塘3块不同样地小蓬竹群落中各物种的重要值、生态位宽度、生态位相似性比例进行研究。结果表明,群落中小蓬竹的重要值最高,为792;生态位宽度值最大,为2.8904;小蓬竹与群落内榆树、女贞、云实、黄连木和椤木石楠的生态位相似性比例较高,分别为0.61、0.66、0.68、0.71和0.69。结论:小蓬竹在群落中的适应能力及利用资源的能力最强,但当环境资源不足时,小蓬竹与群落内生态位相似性比例较高的植物之间存在激烈竞争,小蓬竹的建群种地位会受到威胁,因此,引种时应避免与榆树、女贞、云实、黄连木、椤木石楠一起栽培。
為小蓬竹引種栽培提供指導依據,通過樣方法對貴州囉甸、平塘3塊不同樣地小蓬竹群落中各物種的重要值、生態位寬度、生態位相似性比例進行研究。結果錶明,群落中小蓬竹的重要值最高,為792;生態位寬度值最大,為2.8904;小蓬竹與群落內榆樹、女貞、雲實、黃連木和欏木石楠的生態位相似性比例較高,分彆為0.61、0.66、0.68、0.71和0.69。結論:小蓬竹在群落中的適應能力及利用資源的能力最彊,但噹環境資源不足時,小蓬竹與群落內生態位相似性比例較高的植物之間存在激烈競爭,小蓬竹的建群種地位會受到威脅,因此,引種時應避免與榆樹、女貞、雲實、黃連木、欏木石楠一起栽培。
위소봉죽인충재배제공지도의거,통과양방법대귀주라전、평당3괴불동양지소봉죽군락중각물충적중요치、생태위관도、생태위상사성비례진행연구。결과표명,군락중소봉죽적중요치최고,위792;생태위관도치최대,위2.8904;소봉죽여군락내유수、녀정、운실、황련목화라목석남적생태위상사성비례교고,분별위0.61、0.66、0.68、0.71화0.69。결론:소봉죽재군락중적괄응능력급이용자원적능력최강,단당배경자원불족시,소봉죽여군락내생태위상사성비례교고적식물지간존재격렬경쟁,소봉죽적건군충지위회수도위협,인차,인충시응피면여유수、녀정、운실、황련목、라목석남일기재배。
In order to provide some guidance for introduction and cultivation of D.luodianense,the important values,niche breadth,niche proportional of main species were studied with three different samples in Luodian and Pingtang of Guizhou with sampling methods.Results:the important value of D.luodianense was 792 and niche breadth of was 2.8904;the important value and niche breadth were the highest, niche proportional similarity of D.luodianense was similar to Ulmus pumila, Photinia davidsoniae, Caesalpinia decapetala, Ligustrum lueidum and Pistacia chinensis. The values were respectively 0.61,0.66,0.68,0.71 and 0.69.Conclusion:the adaptive capacity of D.luodianense in the community and the use of resource were the strongest.While intense competitions were observed between D.luodianense and plants with higher proportion of niche similarity when the environmental resource was deficient. And the edificator status would be threatened. Consequently, it was essential to avoid introducing and cultivating Ulmus pumila, Photinia davidsoniae, Caesalpinia decapetala, Ligustrum lueidum and Pistacia chinensis in D.luodianense community.