现代肿瘤医学
現代腫瘤醫學
현대종류의학
JOURNAL OF MODERN ONCOLOGY
2014年
6期
1360-1362
,共3页
金秀颖%孙红花%金永民%崔海%崔现%崔玉珍%朴学哲%张松男%朴龙镇%沈雄虎
金秀穎%孫紅花%金永民%崔海%崔現%崔玉珍%樸學哲%張鬆男%樸龍鎮%瀋雄虎
금수영%손홍화%금영민%최해%최현%최옥진%박학철%장송남%박룡진%침웅호
胃癌%癌胚抗原%糖类抗原19-9
胃癌%癌胚抗原%糖類抗原19-9
위암%암배항원%당류항원19-9
gastric cancer%CEA%CA19-9
目的:探讨联合检测血清肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原( CEA)和糖类抗原19-9( CA19-9)在D2胃癌术后患者随访中的应用价值。方法:采集271例D2胃癌术后病人血清,利用免疫荧光分析法检测血清中CEA和CA19-9含量,并根据检验结果划分为CEA(-)/CA19-9(-)、CEA(﹢)/CA19-9(-)、CEA(-)/CA19-9(﹢)和CEA(﹢)/CA19-9(﹢)四个组。采用Kaplan-meier法进行生存率分析,利用Log-rank检验进行统计学差异性比较,χ2检验进行组间单因素分析。结果:两种肿瘤标志物CEA和CA19-9的联合检测时,两个同时为阳性组患者生存期远远低于单一阳性组;CEA(﹢)/CA19-9(-)组与CEA(-)/CA19-9(﹢)组比较,CEA(-)/CA19-9(﹢)组患者生存期要低于对照组,具有统计学差异( P<0.05)。结论:联合检测血清肿瘤标志物CEA和CA19-9在D2胃癌术后患者随访中,CA19-9阳性者提示更差的预后。
目的:探討聯閤檢測血清腫瘤標誌物癌胚抗原( CEA)和糖類抗原19-9( CA19-9)在D2胃癌術後患者隨訪中的應用價值。方法:採集271例D2胃癌術後病人血清,利用免疫熒光分析法檢測血清中CEA和CA19-9含量,併根據檢驗結果劃分為CEA(-)/CA19-9(-)、CEA(﹢)/CA19-9(-)、CEA(-)/CA19-9(﹢)和CEA(﹢)/CA19-9(﹢)四箇組。採用Kaplan-meier法進行生存率分析,利用Log-rank檢驗進行統計學差異性比較,χ2檢驗進行組間單因素分析。結果:兩種腫瘤標誌物CEA和CA19-9的聯閤檢測時,兩箇同時為暘性組患者生存期遠遠低于單一暘性組;CEA(﹢)/CA19-9(-)組與CEA(-)/CA19-9(﹢)組比較,CEA(-)/CA19-9(﹢)組患者生存期要低于對照組,具有統計學差異( P<0.05)。結論:聯閤檢測血清腫瘤標誌物CEA和CA19-9在D2胃癌術後患者隨訪中,CA19-9暘性者提示更差的預後。
목적:탐토연합검측혈청종류표지물암배항원( CEA)화당류항원19-9( CA19-9)재D2위암술후환자수방중적응용개치。방법:채집271례D2위암술후병인혈청,이용면역형광분석법검측혈청중CEA화CA19-9함량,병근거검험결과화분위CEA(-)/CA19-9(-)、CEA(﹢)/CA19-9(-)、CEA(-)/CA19-9(﹢)화CEA(﹢)/CA19-9(﹢)사개조。채용Kaplan-meier법진행생존솔분석,이용Log-rank검험진행통계학차이성비교,χ2검험진행조간단인소분석。결과:량충종류표지물CEA화CA19-9적연합검측시,량개동시위양성조환자생존기원원저우단일양성조;CEA(﹢)/CA19-9(-)조여CEA(-)/CA19-9(﹢)조비교,CEA(-)/CA19-9(﹢)조환자생존기요저우대조조,구유통계학차이( P<0.05)。결론:연합검측혈청종류표지물CEA화CA19-9재D2위암술후환자수방중,CA19-9양성자제시경차적예후。
Objective:To investigate the clinical value of combined detection of serum tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 in the follow-up of postoperative gastric cancer. Methods:The CEA and CA19-9 were detected with flu-oroimmunoassay in 271 postoperative gastric cancer patients. According to the results,the patients were classified into four groups:CEA( -)/CA19-9( -),CEA( ﹢)/CA19-9( -),CEA( -)/CA19-9( ﹢)and CEA( ﹢)/CA19-9( ﹢). The survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-meier method,differences between survival curves were ex-amined with Log-rank test,and univariate analysis was performed using Chi-square test. Results:When combined detection with CEA and CA19-9,both as the positive group patient survival was much lower than the single positive group. The patients survival was lower in CEA( -)/CA19-9( ﹢)group compared with CEA( ﹢)/CA19-9( -) group. Differences were statistically significant(P<0. 05). Conclusion:Combined detection of serum tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 in the follow-up of postoperative gastric cancer,with CA-199 positive suggests poorer prognosis.