海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
11期
1587-1589
,共3页
戴莉萍%孔卫红%何伟珍%尹志华%叶志中
戴莉萍%孔衛紅%何偉珍%尹誌華%葉誌中
대리평%공위홍%하위진%윤지화%협지중
物理治疗%类风湿关节炎%疗效
物理治療%類風濕關節炎%療效
물리치료%류풍습관절염%료효
Physiotherapy%Rheumatoid arthritis%Efficacy
目的:比较药物联合物理治疗与单纯药物治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的短期临床疗效。方法随机双盲平行试验,纳入72例活动性RA患者,按2:1的比例被随机分配到试验组48和对照组24例。试验组为传统药物(来氟米特20 mg,1次/d+甲氨蝶呤10 mg,1次/周+非甾类抗炎药)联合物理治疗(超声波+微波+电疗)组,对照组为单纯传统药物(来氟米特+甲氨蝶呤+非甾类抗炎药)治疗组。受试者在试验第1周和第2周随访,评价疗效。同时比较两组患者的压痛和肿胀关节数、晨僵时间、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)以及实验室炎症指标红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)。结果治疗1周及2周后试验组患者ACR20、ACR50缓解的比例都显著高于对照组(P<0.05);试验组患者疗效指标均较治疗前水平明显降低(P<0.01);两组患者的实验室炎症指标ESR、CRP均较治疗前水平显著降低(P<0.05)。结论药物联合物理治疗RA的短期疗效明显优于单纯药物治疗,可1周内明显改善各项临床症状、体征,降低实验室炎症指标,提高患者生活质量。
目的:比較藥物聯閤物理治療與單純藥物治療類風濕關節炎(RA)的短期臨床療效。方法隨機雙盲平行試驗,納入72例活動性RA患者,按2:1的比例被隨機分配到試驗組48和對照組24例。試驗組為傳統藥物(來氟米特20 mg,1次/d+甲氨蝶呤10 mg,1次/週+非甾類抗炎藥)聯閤物理治療(超聲波+微波+電療)組,對照組為單純傳統藥物(來氟米特+甲氨蝶呤+非甾類抗炎藥)治療組。受試者在試驗第1週和第2週隨訪,評價療效。同時比較兩組患者的壓痛和腫脹關節數、晨僵時間、疼痛視覺模擬評分(VAS評分)、健康評估問捲(HAQ)以及實驗室炎癥指標紅細胞沉降率(ESR)、C-反應蛋白(CRP)。結果治療1週及2週後試驗組患者ACR20、ACR50緩解的比例都顯著高于對照組(P<0.05);試驗組患者療效指標均較治療前水平明顯降低(P<0.01);兩組患者的實驗室炎癥指標ESR、CRP均較治療前水平顯著降低(P<0.05)。結論藥物聯閤物理治療RA的短期療效明顯優于單純藥物治療,可1週內明顯改善各項臨床癥狀、體徵,降低實驗室炎癥指標,提高患者生活質量。
목적:비교약물연합물리치료여단순약물치료류풍습관절염(RA)적단기림상료효。방법수궤쌍맹평행시험,납입72례활동성RA환자,안2:1적비례피수궤분배도시험조48화대조조24례。시험조위전통약물(래불미특20 mg,1차/d+갑안접령10 mg,1차/주+비치류항염약)연합물리치료(초성파+미파+전료)조,대조조위단순전통약물(래불미특+갑안접령+비치류항염약)치료조。수시자재시험제1주화제2주수방,평개료효。동시비교량조환자적압통화종창관절수、신강시간、동통시각모의평분(VAS평분)、건강평고문권(HAQ)이급실험실염증지표홍세포침강솔(ESR)、C-반응단백(CRP)。결과치료1주급2주후시험조환자ACR20、ACR50완해적비례도현저고우대조조(P<0.05);시험조환자료효지표균교치료전수평명현강저(P<0.01);량조환자적실험실염증지표ESR、CRP균교치료전수평현저강저(P<0.05)。결론약물연합물리치료RA적단기료효명현우우단순약물치료,가1주내명현개선각항림상증상、체정,강저실험실염증지표,제고환자생활질량。
Objective To compare the short-term effect of medication combined with physiotherapy and on-ly traditional medication on the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Seventy two patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were divided into 2 groups by randomized double-blind parallel test, and 48 cases in observation group were treated with medication (Leflunomide, 20 mg/d, MTX 10 mg/week, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent) combined with physiotherapy (ultrasonic, microwave, electrotherapy), while the other 24 cases in control group were treated with only traditional medication. All patients were followed in 1 week and 2 weeks after treatment for as-sessment. Activity and efficacy evaluation indexes, including the number of joints with pain, swelling, the time of morning stiffing, visual analog score, health assessment questionnaire, ESR and CRP were evaluated after 2 weeks of treatment. Results 1 week and 2 weeks after treatment, the ACR20 and the ACR50 improvement rates in the observa-tion group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The disease efficacy evaluation indexes and activity indexes significantly decreased (P<0.01, P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional medication, the effect of medication combined with physiotherapy was much better, which can evidently reduce the symptoms, and improve the life-qualify of the RA patients in short-term.