中外医学研究
中外醫學研究
중외의학연구
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
2014年
16期
78-79,80
,共3页
护理干预%消化内镜诊疗%心率%血压
護理榦預%消化內鏡診療%心率%血壓
호리간예%소화내경진료%심솔%혈압
Nursing Interventions%Gastrointestinal Endoscopy%Heart rate%Blood pressure
目的：研究对消化内镜诊疗患者应用护理干预的有效性及可行性。方法：选取笔者所在医院收治的162例患者，采用随机数字表法将其分为A、B两组，各81例。A组按照惯例对其进行一般护理，B组均在上述基础上对其给予护理干预。对两组患者的收缩压、舒张压、心率等进行统计比较。结果：A组患者治疗后的收缩压为(118.65±10.43)mm Hg，心率为(78.72±9.83)次/min；B组患者治疗后的收缩压为(134.61±12.51)mm Hg，心率为(92.55±7.49)次/min。两组患者收缩压、心律治疗前后比较，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)，且治疗后组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后B组焦虑度低于A组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B组护理满意度优级82.72%高于A组的53.09%，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：对进行消化内镜诊疗的患者给予对应的护理干预可以取得较好的效果，有利于患者身体健康的恢复，提高患者护理满意程度，可以在消化科推广应用。
目的：研究對消化內鏡診療患者應用護理榦預的有效性及可行性。方法：選取筆者所在醫院收治的162例患者，採用隨機數字錶法將其分為A、B兩組，各81例。A組按照慣例對其進行一般護理，B組均在上述基礎上對其給予護理榦預。對兩組患者的收縮壓、舒張壓、心率等進行統計比較。結果：A組患者治療後的收縮壓為(118.65±10.43)mm Hg，心率為(78.72±9.83)次/min；B組患者治療後的收縮壓為(134.61±12.51)mm Hg，心率為(92.55±7.49)次/min。兩組患者收縮壓、心律治療前後比較，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)，且治療後組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。治療後B組焦慮度低于A組，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。B組護理滿意度優級82.72%高于A組的53.09%，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論：對進行消化內鏡診療的患者給予對應的護理榦預可以取得較好的效果，有利于患者身體健康的恢複，提高患者護理滿意程度，可以在消化科推廣應用。
목적：연구대소화내경진료환자응용호리간예적유효성급가행성。방법：선취필자소재의원수치적162례환자，채용수궤수자표법장기분위A、B량조，각81례。A조안조관례대기진행일반호리，B조균재상술기출상대기급여호리간예。대량조환자적수축압、서장압、심솔등진행통계비교。결과：A조환자치료후적수축압위(118.65±10.43)mm Hg，심솔위(78.72±9.83)차/min；B조환자치료후적수축압위(134.61±12.51)mm Hg，심솔위(92.55±7.49)차/min。량조환자수축압、심률치료전후비교，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)，차치료후조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。치료후B조초필도저우A조，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。B조호리만의도우급82.72%고우A조적53.09%，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론：대진행소화내경진료적환자급여대응적호리간예가이취득교호적효과，유리우환자신체건강적회복，제고환자호리만의정도，가이재소화과추엄응용。
Objective:Research on the digestive endoscopic diagnosis and treatment in patients with nursing intervention is effective and feasible. Method:162 cases of patients were treated in author’s hospital,by using the method to random number table is divided into A,B two groups,81 cases in each. It was customary to general nursing of group A. Group B were based on the above given nursing intervention on it. On two groups of patients with systolic pressure,diastolic blood pressure,heart rate and other statistical comparison.Result:After treatment in patients with systolic blood pressure for group A was (118.65±10.43)mm Hg,heart rate was (78.72±9.83) times/min;For group B after treatment in patients with systolic blood pressure was (134.61±12.51)mm Hg, heart rate was (92.55±7.49) times/min. Systolic blood pressure,heart rate,two groups of patients before and after treatment were compared,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05),and comparing the difference was statistically significant between groups after treatment(P<0.05). Anxiety degrees of group A lower was than that of group B after treatment was statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Group B nursing satisfaction optimal level of 82.72%was higher than that of group A(53.09%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:To digestive endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of patients to give corresponding nursing intervention can obtain good effect,is beneficial to the recovery of patients with healthy body,improve patient satisfaction with care,can be used for in the digestive department.
