当代医学
噹代醫學
당대의학
CHINA CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE
2014年
16期
18-19
,共2页
周哲%陈炜璋%谭文平%杨小军
週哲%陳煒璋%譚文平%楊小軍
주철%진위장%담문평%양소군
近端抗旋髓内针%动力髁钢板%转子骨折
近耑抗鏇髓內針%動力髁鋼闆%轉子骨摺
근단항선수내침%동력과강판%전자골절
PFNA%Dynamic condylar screw%Femoral intertrochanteric fractures
目的:探讨股骨近端抗旋髓内针(proximal femoral nail,PFNA)与动力髁钢板治疗转子骨折的疗效,以供临床参考。方法选择2010年8月~2012年7月收治的股骨转子骨折患者85例作为研究对象,随机分组。对照组接受PFNA治疗,观察组接受动力髁钢板治疗。术后随访1年,对比2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间和髋关节功能恢复情况的差异性。结果与对照组对比,观察组患者手术时间较长(93.68±14.85)min、术中出血量较大(283.96±40.12)mL、骨折愈合时间较短(97.32±9.65)d,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对比2组患者术后1年Harris髋关节评分发现,组间差异无统计学意义。结论 PFNA与动力髁钢板治疗转子骨折后患者髋关节功能均得到良好的恢复。两种内固定方法各有优势,其中PFNA内固定手术时间短、术中出血量少,动力髁钢板内固定术后愈合快,在今后的临床工作中根据具体病情选择适合的内固定方法。
目的:探討股骨近耑抗鏇髓內針(proximal femoral nail,PFNA)與動力髁鋼闆治療轉子骨摺的療效,以供臨床參攷。方法選擇2010年8月~2012年7月收治的股骨轉子骨摺患者85例作為研究對象,隨機分組。對照組接受PFNA治療,觀察組接受動力髁鋼闆治療。術後隨訪1年,對比2組患者手術時間、術中齣血量、骨摺愈閤時間和髖關節功能恢複情況的差異性。結果與對照組對比,觀察組患者手術時間較長(93.68±14.85)min、術中齣血量較大(283.96±40.12)mL、骨摺愈閤時間較短(97.32±9.65)d,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。對比2組患者術後1年Harris髖關節評分髮現,組間差異無統計學意義。結論 PFNA與動力髁鋼闆治療轉子骨摺後患者髖關節功能均得到良好的恢複。兩種內固定方法各有優勢,其中PFNA內固定手術時間短、術中齣血量少,動力髁鋼闆內固定術後愈閤快,在今後的臨床工作中根據具體病情選擇適閤的內固定方法。
목적:탐토고골근단항선수내침(proximal femoral nail,PFNA)여동력과강판치료전자골절적료효,이공림상삼고。방법선택2010년8월~2012년7월수치적고골전자골절환자85례작위연구대상,수궤분조。대조조접수PFNA치료,관찰조접수동력과강판치료。술후수방1년,대비2조환자수술시간、술중출혈량、골절유합시간화관관절공능회복정황적차이성。결과여대조조대비,관찰조환자수술시간교장(93.68±14.85)min、술중출혈량교대(283.96±40.12)mL、골절유합시간교단(97.32±9.65)d,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。대비2조환자술후1년Harris관관절평분발현,조간차이무통계학의의。결론 PFNA여동력과강판치료전자골절후환자관관절공능균득도량호적회복。량충내고정방법각유우세,기중PFNA내고정수술시간단、술중출혈량소,동력과강판내고정술후유합쾌,재금후적림상공작중근거구체병정선택괄합적내고정방법。
Objective Investigate the clinical effect of proximal femoral nail ( PFNA ) and dynamic condylar screw in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures, for clinical references. Methods 85 cases with femoral intertrochanteric fractures patients in Aug. 2010 to Jul. 2012 in our hospital were choosed as research objects, randomly grouping. The control group was received PFNA treatment, the observe group was received dynamic condylar screw treatment. All cases were followed up 1 year later. The operation time, amount of bleeding, fracture healing andhip joint Harris score of the two groups were compared. Results Compared with the control group, Compared with the control group, longer surgical patients in the observation group (93.68 ± 14.85)min, greater blood loss (283.96 ± 40.12)mL, fracture healing time is shorter (97.32 ± 9.65)d, has statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Compared of The hip joint Harris score of the two groups has no significant differences. Conclusion PFNA and dynamic condylar screw in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures has good clinical effect in hip joint recovery. Two operation has advantage respectively, the operation time of PFNA is short and the amount of bleeding is little. The healing time of dynamic condylar screw fracture is short. The appropriate operation mode for femoral intertrochanteric fractures will be choosed in clinical work.