中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2014年
23期
1798-1800
,共3页
金川连%茅爱武%陈越%孙贤俊%蒋霆辉
金川連%茅愛武%陳越%孫賢俊%蔣霆輝
금천련%모애무%진월%손현준%장정휘
胰腺肿瘤%放射学,介入性%药物疗法,联合
胰腺腫瘤%放射學,介入性%藥物療法,聯閤
이선종류%방사학,개입성%약물요법,연합
Pancreatic neoplasms%Radiology,interventional%Drug therapy,combination
目的:探讨晚期胰腺癌一线化疗失败后,以动脉灌注联合化疗作为挽救性二线治疗的临床价值。方法回顾性分析上海市松江区中心医院和上海交通大学附属仁济医院同仁分院放射介入科近3年(2010-2012)收治的35例吉西他滨一线化疗失败的晚期胰腺癌患者,采用股动脉穿剌,胃十二指肠动脉、胰背动脉、胰大动脉、胰尾动脉,相关肋腰动脉,以及肠系膜上动脉等肿瘤相关供血动脉插管,行化疗药物灌注。方案为:顺铂30 mg/m2,吉西他滨1000 mg/m2,每3~4周为1个疗程,总疗程不限。结果35例共行局部化疗217个周期,最少行1个周期,最多9个周期,平均6.2个周期。其中:CR 1例,PR 6例,SD 15例,有效率( CR+PR)为20%,疾病控制率( DCR)为68.75%,中位生存期为9.6个月,中位 TTP 为3.7个月。 CBR总有效率、稳定率和无效率分别为51.4%、25.7%和22.9%。疼痛评分改善者88.57%(31/35),42.86%(15/35)疼痛缓解持续时间为3~20 d (中位时间11 d),17.14%(6/35)疼痛缓解20 d以上,疼痛缓解维持时间最长160 d。半数患者有不同程度的不良反应,Ⅲ、Ⅳ度白细胞减少占17.14%(6/35),8.57%(3/35)。结论将动脉灌注联合化疗作为晚期胰腺癌挽救性二线治疗是具有临床价值的,具有较好的疾病控制率和疼痛缓解率。
目的:探討晚期胰腺癌一線化療失敗後,以動脈灌註聯閤化療作為輓救性二線治療的臨床價值。方法迴顧性分析上海市鬆江區中心醫院和上海交通大學附屬仁濟醫院同仁分院放射介入科近3年(2010-2012)收治的35例吉西他濱一線化療失敗的晚期胰腺癌患者,採用股動脈穿剌,胃十二指腸動脈、胰揹動脈、胰大動脈、胰尾動脈,相關肋腰動脈,以及腸繫膜上動脈等腫瘤相關供血動脈插管,行化療藥物灌註。方案為:順鉑30 mg/m2,吉西他濱1000 mg/m2,每3~4週為1箇療程,總療程不限。結果35例共行跼部化療217箇週期,最少行1箇週期,最多9箇週期,平均6.2箇週期。其中:CR 1例,PR 6例,SD 15例,有效率( CR+PR)為20%,疾病控製率( DCR)為68.75%,中位生存期為9.6箇月,中位 TTP 為3.7箇月。 CBR總有效率、穩定率和無效率分彆為51.4%、25.7%和22.9%。疼痛評分改善者88.57%(31/35),42.86%(15/35)疼痛緩解持續時間為3~20 d (中位時間11 d),17.14%(6/35)疼痛緩解20 d以上,疼痛緩解維持時間最長160 d。半數患者有不同程度的不良反應,Ⅲ、Ⅳ度白細胞減少佔17.14%(6/35),8.57%(3/35)。結論將動脈灌註聯閤化療作為晚期胰腺癌輓救性二線治療是具有臨床價值的,具有較好的疾病控製率和疼痛緩解率。
목적:탐토만기이선암일선화료실패후,이동맥관주연합화료작위만구성이선치료적림상개치。방법회고성분석상해시송강구중심의원화상해교통대학부속인제의원동인분원방사개입과근3년(2010-2012)수치적35례길서타빈일선화료실패적만기이선암환자,채용고동맥천랄,위십이지장동맥、이배동맥、이대동맥、이미동맥,상관륵요동맥,이급장계막상동맥등종류상관공혈동맥삽관,행화료약물관주。방안위:순박30 mg/m2,길서타빈1000 mg/m2,매3~4주위1개료정,총료정불한。결과35례공행국부화료217개주기,최소행1개주기,최다9개주기,평균6.2개주기。기중:CR 1례,PR 6례,SD 15례,유효솔( CR+PR)위20%,질병공제솔( DCR)위68.75%,중위생존기위9.6개월,중위 TTP 위3.7개월。 CBR총유효솔、은정솔화무효솔분별위51.4%、25.7%화22.9%。동통평분개선자88.57%(31/35),42.86%(15/35)동통완해지속시간위3~20 d (중위시간11 d),17.14%(6/35)동통완해20 d이상,동통완해유지시간최장160 d。반수환자유불동정도적불량반응,Ⅲ、Ⅳ도백세포감소점17.14%(6/35),8.57%(3/35)。결론장동맥관주연합화료작위만기이선암만구성이선치료시구유림상개치적,구유교호적질병공제솔화동통완해솔。
Objective To discuss arterial infusion chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic carcinoma salvage after failed vein chemotherapy.Methods 35 cases with Ⅳ stage pancreatic carcinoma , all cases are failed first-line chemotherapy of Gemcitabine.Via femoral artery puncture , gastroduodenal artery , the dorsal pancreatic artery , pancreatic artery , pancreatic tail artery , the rib waist artery, superior mesenteric artery and tumor related to blood supply artery intubation and chemical drug perfusion.Plan:Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 , Gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m2.Treatment for every 3-4 weeks, there is no limit on the total number.Results 35 cases were local chemotherapy for 217 cycles, at least 1 cycle, a maximum of 9 cycles, 6.2 cycles on average.Among which:CR 1 case, PR 6 cases, SD 15 cases, effective rate ( CR+PR) is 20%,disease control rate ( DCR) is 68.75%.The median survival time was 9.6 months.The median TTP was 3.7 months.Total effective rate of CBR , the stability rate of CBR and inefficiency rate of CBR were 51.4%,25.7% and 22.9% respectively.Pain score improvement 88.57%(31/35),42.86%(15/35)Pain relief last for 3 -20 days( median time11 days).17.14%(6/35)Pain relief last for more than 20 days.Pain relief maintain the most elderly 160 days.Half of the patients have different degree of side reaction ,Ⅲ,Ⅳdegree leukopenia accounted for 17.14%(6/35), 8.57%(3/35).Conclusion The arterial perfusion chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer salvage is of clinical value , with better disease control rate and the rate of pain relief.