玻璃纤维
玻璃纖維
파리섬유
FIBER GLASS
2012年
2期
34-38
,共5页
玄武岩纤维/聚丙烯%热塑板%拉伸性能%排列方向%硅烷偶联剂改性处理
玄武巖纖維/聚丙烯%熱塑闆%拉伸性能%排列方嚮%硅烷偶聯劑改性處理
현무암섬유/취병희%열소판%랍신성능%배렬방향%규완우련제개성처리
basalt fiber/polypropylene%thermoplastic panel%tensile properties%orientation%coupling agent treatment
为了研究硅烷偶联剂处理和玄武岩纤维的排列方向对玄武岩纤维/聚丙烯热塑板的拉伸性能的影响,试验采用质量分数为0.75%的KH-550偶联剂对玄武岩纤维进行处理,再将玄武岩纤维和聚丙烯进行混合开松、梳理成网,采用模压成型工艺制备了A(玄武岩纤维经偶联剂处理)和B(玄武岩纤维未经偶联剂处理)两种热塑板,使用Instron3369型万能强力机测试其拉伸性能。结论:KH-550偶联剂改性处理对热塑板的拉伸性能改善明显,与B板相比,A板的横向强度和模量分别提高了91.4%和33.5%,纵向强度和模量分别提高了40.2%和29.5%;A、B两种板材的纵向拉伸性能指标明显优于横向拉伸性能,A板的纵向强度和模量分别是横向的1.7和1.5倍,B板的纵向强度和模量分别为横向的2.3和1.5倍。
為瞭研究硅烷偶聯劑處理和玄武巖纖維的排列方嚮對玄武巖纖維/聚丙烯熱塑闆的拉伸性能的影響,試驗採用質量分數為0.75%的KH-550偶聯劑對玄武巖纖維進行處理,再將玄武巖纖維和聚丙烯進行混閤開鬆、梳理成網,採用模壓成型工藝製備瞭A(玄武巖纖維經偶聯劑處理)和B(玄武巖纖維未經偶聯劑處理)兩種熱塑闆,使用Instron3369型萬能彊力機測試其拉伸性能。結論:KH-550偶聯劑改性處理對熱塑闆的拉伸性能改善明顯,與B闆相比,A闆的橫嚮彊度和模量分彆提高瞭91.4%和33.5%,縱嚮彊度和模量分彆提高瞭40.2%和29.5%;A、B兩種闆材的縱嚮拉伸性能指標明顯優于橫嚮拉伸性能,A闆的縱嚮彊度和模量分彆是橫嚮的1.7和1.5倍,B闆的縱嚮彊度和模量分彆為橫嚮的2.3和1.5倍。
위료연구규완우련제처리화현무암섬유적배렬방향대현무암섬유/취병희열소판적랍신성능적영향,시험채용질량분수위0.75%적KH-550우련제대현무암섬유진행처리,재장현무암섬유화취병희진행혼합개송、소리성망,채용모압성형공예제비료A(현무암섬유경우련제처리)화B(현무암섬유미경우련제처리)량충열소판,사용Instron3369형만능강력궤측시기랍신성능。결론:KH-550우련제개성처리대열소판적랍신성능개선명현,여B판상비,A판적횡향강도화모량분별제고료91.4%화33.5%,종향강도화모량분별제고료40.2%화29.5%;A、B량충판재적종향랍신성능지표명현우우횡향랍신성능,A판적종향강도화모량분별시횡향적1.7화1.5배,B판적종향강도화모량분별위횡향적2.3화1.5배。
In order to study the effects of silane coupling agent treatment and the orientation of basalt fibers on the tensile properties of polypropylene thermoplastic panels reinforced with basalt fibers, the basalt fibers were treated by KH-550 at 0.75 wt%, and then mixed with polypropylene fibers and carded into webs, which were molded into panel A (fibers treated by coupling agent) and B (fibers not treated). The tensile properties of these panels were determined by Instron 3369 universal tester. Conclusions: The tensile properties of the thermoplastic panels were affected significantly by KH-550. Comparing with panel B, panel A’s tensile strength and modulus in transverse direction improved 91.4% and 33.5% respectively, while those in longitudinal direction improved 40.2% and 29.5%. The tensile properties of both panels in longitudinal direction were better than those in transverse direction: The strength and modulus of panel A in longitudinal direction were 1.7 times and 1.5 times those in transverse direction, while the strength and modulus of panel B in longitudinal direction were 2.3 times and 1.5 times those in transverse direction.