四川农业大学学报
四川農業大學學報
사천농업대학학보
JOURNAL OF SICHUAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
3期
326-330
,共5页
黄永梅%袁韫聪%赵小玲%朱庆%张露%王珍%王彦%尹华东%叶林
黃永梅%袁韞聰%趙小玲%硃慶%張露%王珍%王彥%尹華東%葉林
황영매%원운총%조소령%주경%장로%왕진%왕언%윤화동%협림
二郎山山地鸡%饲养方式%生产性能%相关分析
二郎山山地鷄%飼養方式%生產性能%相關分析
이랑산산지계%사양방식%생산성능%상관분석
Erlang mountainous chicken%housing system%production traits%comparison analysis
【目的】为掌握培育的地方特色蛋鸡配套系生产性能和环境适应性。【方法】本试验比较笼养和平养两种饲养方式下两个配套组合(SD1HS2、HS1HS2)的存活率、蛋品质、各周龄体重和产蛋率等性能。【结果】从第8周龄开始SD1HS2公鸡体重显著高于 HS1HS2公鸡体重(P<0.05);从第6周龄开始,两种饲养条件下的SD1HS2母鸡体重均显著高于 HS1 HS2母鸡体重(P<0.05)。两种饲养方式下,SD1 HS2存活率及蛋黄比例均高于 HS1 HS2(P<0.05),而 HS1HS2的产蛋量及蛋白高度则高于 SD1HS2(P<0.05);同时两群体鸡平养存活率均高于笼养(P<0.05),而它们的产蛋量以及蛋白高度则是笼养优于平养(P<0.05);笼养条件下的 HS1HS2组合在产蛋量及蛋白高度上均显著优于其他组合。【结论】笼养条件下两群体鸡产蛋量和蛋白高度高于平养。两群体中,HS1 HS2的产蛋率和蛋品质优于SD1 HS2。笼养是比较适合两个培育品种的饲养方式。
【目的】為掌握培育的地方特色蛋鷄配套繫生產性能和環境適應性。【方法】本試驗比較籠養和平養兩種飼養方式下兩箇配套組閤(SD1HS2、HS1HS2)的存活率、蛋品質、各週齡體重和產蛋率等性能。【結果】從第8週齡開始SD1HS2公鷄體重顯著高于 HS1HS2公鷄體重(P<0.05);從第6週齡開始,兩種飼養條件下的SD1HS2母鷄體重均顯著高于 HS1 HS2母鷄體重(P<0.05)。兩種飼養方式下,SD1 HS2存活率及蛋黃比例均高于 HS1 HS2(P<0.05),而 HS1HS2的產蛋量及蛋白高度則高于 SD1HS2(P<0.05);同時兩群體鷄平養存活率均高于籠養(P<0.05),而它們的產蛋量以及蛋白高度則是籠養優于平養(P<0.05);籠養條件下的 HS1HS2組閤在產蛋量及蛋白高度上均顯著優于其他組閤。【結論】籠養條件下兩群體鷄產蛋量和蛋白高度高于平養。兩群體中,HS1 HS2的產蛋率和蛋品質優于SD1 HS2。籠養是比較適閤兩箇培育品種的飼養方式。
【목적】위장악배육적지방특색단계배투계생산성능화배경괄응성。【방법】본시험비교롱양화평양량충사양방식하량개배투조합(SD1HS2、HS1HS2)적존활솔、단품질、각주령체중화산단솔등성능。【결과】종제8주령개시SD1HS2공계체중현저고우 HS1HS2공계체중(P<0.05);종제6주령개시,량충사양조건하적SD1HS2모계체중균현저고우 HS1 HS2모계체중(P<0.05)。량충사양방식하,SD1 HS2존활솔급단황비례균고우 HS1 HS2(P<0.05),이 HS1HS2적산단량급단백고도칙고우 SD1HS2(P<0.05);동시량군체계평양존활솔균고우롱양(P<0.05),이타문적산단량이급단백고도칙시롱양우우평양(P<0.05);롱양조건하적 HS1HS2조합재산단량급단백고도상균현저우우기타조합。【결론】롱양조건하량군체계산단량화단백고도고우평양。량군체중,HS1 HS2적산단솔화단품질우우SD1 HS2。롱양시비교괄합량개배육품충적사양방식。
Obj ective]To evaluate the performance and environmental adaptability of cultivated layer lines.[Method]We measured the livability,egg quality,weekly body weight,and laying rate of two crosses (SD1HS2 and HS1HS2)raised by two housing systems the pen and cage,re-spectively.[Results]From 8 week-old,males of SD1 HS2 were heavier than HS1 HS2 in body weight (P<0. 05);from 6 week-old,the females body weight of SD1HS2 in the two housing sys-tems were heavier than that of HS1 HS2 (P<0. 05 ).In the two housing systems,the livability and yolk percentage of SD1 HS2 were higher than that of HS1 HS2 (P<0. 05 ),whereas its egg production and protein concentration were higher than those of SD1HS2 (P<0. 05).The livabili-ty of penned birds were higher than that of caged (P<0. 05 ).The egg production and protein concentration of caged birds were higher than those of penned birds (P<0. 05).The egg produc-tion and protein concentration of caged HS1 HS2 were higher than those of SD1 HS2 .[Conclu-sion]The results suggested that the egg production and albumen height of the caged layers,no matter from cross SD1 HS2 or HS1 HS2 were superior to the penned chickens.The laying rate and egg quality of HS1 HS2 were higher than those of SD1 HS2 .The cage housing system is fit for our two crosses.