国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2013年
11期
1635-1637
,共3页
朱新锋%杨拥%林秀凡%龙素琼
硃新鋒%楊擁%林秀凡%龍素瓊
주신봉%양옹%림수범%룡소경
腹腔镜%胆道镜%保胆取石%胆囊结石
腹腔鏡%膽道鏡%保膽取石%膽囊結石
복강경%담도경%보담취석%담낭결석
Laparoscopy%Choledochoscopy%Gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy%Gallbladder stones
目的 探讨腹腔镜联合胆道镜行保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果.方法 76例胆囊结石患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,对照组采用传统开腹手术,观察组采用腹腔镜联合胆道镜微创手术.结果 两组均顺利手术,术后无严重并发症.观察组手术时间[(123.7±12.8) min]略长于对照组[(118.9±10.3) min],并发症率(7.7%)略高于对照组(5.3%),但均差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).观察组手术出血量[(74.3±9.2)ml]、肛门排气时间[(23.7±6.4)h]和住院时间[(8.1±1.3)d]均显著少于对照组[(138.8±17.6)ml、(37.6±9.1)h、(13.4±2.6)d],均P<0.01.结论 腹腔镜联合胆道镜手术创伤小,安全性高,术后康复快,胆囊功能良好.结石类型相对简单、直径相对较小的患者,可在严格选择病例的基础上考虑此术式.
目的 探討腹腔鏡聯閤膽道鏡行保膽取石術治療膽囊結石的臨床效果.方法 76例膽囊結石患者作為研究對象,隨機分為觀察組和對照組,對照組採用傳統開腹手術,觀察組採用腹腔鏡聯閤膽道鏡微創手術.結果 兩組均順利手術,術後無嚴重併髮癥.觀察組手術時間[(123.7±12.8) min]略長于對照組[(118.9±10.3) min],併髮癥率(7.7%)略高于對照組(5.3%),但均差異無統計學意義(均P>0.05).觀察組手術齣血量[(74.3±9.2)ml]、肛門排氣時間[(23.7±6.4)h]和住院時間[(8.1±1.3)d]均顯著少于對照組[(138.8±17.6)ml、(37.6±9.1)h、(13.4±2.6)d],均P<0.01.結論 腹腔鏡聯閤膽道鏡手術創傷小,安全性高,術後康複快,膽囊功能良好.結石類型相對簡單、直徑相對較小的患者,可在嚴格選擇病例的基礎上攷慮此術式.
목적 탐토복강경연합담도경행보담취석술치료담낭결석적림상효과.방법 76례담낭결석환자작위연구대상,수궤분위관찰조화대조조,대조조채용전통개복수술,관찰조채용복강경연합담도경미창수술.결과 량조균순리수술,술후무엄중병발증.관찰조수술시간[(123.7±12.8) min]략장우대조조[(118.9±10.3) min],병발증솔(7.7%)략고우대조조(5.3%),단균차이무통계학의의(균P>0.05).관찰조수술출혈량[(74.3±9.2)ml]、항문배기시간[(23.7±6.4)h]화주원시간[(8.1±1.3)d]균현저소우대조조[(138.8±17.6)ml、(37.6±9.1)h、(13.4±2.6)d],균P<0.01.결론 복강경연합담도경수술창상소,안전성고,술후강복쾌,담낭공능량호.결석류형상대간단、직경상대교소적환자,가재엄격선택병례적기출상고필차술식.
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic combined with choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholelithotomy for cholecystolithiasis.Methods 76 patients with gallstone were randomly divided into a study group and a control group.The control group underwent traditional open surgery,while the study group received minimally invasive laparoscopic combined with choledochoscopic surgery.Results The procedures were successfully performed on both groups.No severe postoperative complications occurred.The surgical duration was slightly longer and the rate of complications was mildly higher in the study than in the control group,with no significant differences (P<0.05).The intraoperative bleeding volume was smaller and exhaust time and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in the study group than in the control group (P<0.01).Conclusions Laparoscopic combined with choledochoscopic surgery is less invasive and has higher safety and faster postoperative recovery.This procedure should be considered in patients with better gallbladder function and a relatively simple type of stone with a relatively shorter diameter on the basis of strict selection of patients.