新疆医科大学学报
新疆醫科大學學報
신강의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF XINJIANG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
9期
1199-1201
,共3页
慢性牙周炎%Vector治疗仪%牙周翻瓣术
慢性牙週炎%Vector治療儀%牙週翻瓣術
만성아주염%Vector치료의%아주번판술
chronic periodontitis%VectorTM altrasonic devicer%flap surgery
目的:评价 Vector治疗仪用于牙周翻瓣术中的临床疗效。方法选择左右侧需行牙周翻瓣术的37例慢性牙周炎患者,试验组为患者一侧行牙周翻瓣术,Vector治疗仪进行根面平整,对照组为患者另一侧行牙周翻瓣术,Gracey刮治器行根面平整,两组于术前、术后3、6个月分别检测牙周探诊深度(probingdepth,PD)、附着丧失(clinical attachment loss,CAL)、菌斑指数(plaque index,PLI)和龈沟出血指数(sulcus bleeding index,SBI)。结果术后3、6个月两组各项临床指标均较术前明显改善(P <0.05),两组组间PD、PLI、SBI值比较差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05);而两组间CAL值比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);两组在控制牙槽骨吸收疗效上差异无统计学意义。结论 Vector治疗仪应用于牙周翻瓣术治疗慢性牙周炎的疗效优于单纯翻瓣术。
目的:評價 Vector治療儀用于牙週翻瓣術中的臨床療效。方法選擇左右側需行牙週翻瓣術的37例慢性牙週炎患者,試驗組為患者一側行牙週翻瓣術,Vector治療儀進行根麵平整,對照組為患者另一側行牙週翻瓣術,Gracey颳治器行根麵平整,兩組于術前、術後3、6箇月分彆檢測牙週探診深度(probingdepth,PD)、附著喪失(clinical attachment loss,CAL)、菌斑指數(plaque index,PLI)和齦溝齣血指數(sulcus bleeding index,SBI)。結果術後3、6箇月兩組各項臨床指標均較術前明顯改善(P <0.05),兩組組間PD、PLI、SBI值比較差異均無統計學意義(P >0.05);而兩組間CAL值比較差異有統計學意義(P <0.05);兩組在控製牙槽骨吸收療效上差異無統計學意義。結論 Vector治療儀應用于牙週翻瓣術治療慢性牙週炎的療效優于單純翻瓣術。
목적:평개 Vector치료의용우아주번판술중적림상료효。방법선택좌우측수행아주번판술적37례만성아주염환자,시험조위환자일측행아주번판술,Vector치료의진행근면평정,대조조위환자령일측행아주번판술,Gracey괄치기행근면평정,량조우술전、술후3、6개월분별검측아주탐진심도(probingdepth,PD)、부착상실(clinical attachment loss,CAL)、균반지수(plaque index,PLI)화간구출혈지수(sulcus bleeding index,SBI)。결과술후3、6개월량조각항림상지표균교술전명현개선(P <0.05),량조조간PD、PLI、SBI치비교차이균무통계학의의(P >0.05);이량조간CAL치비교차이유통계학의의(P <0.05);량조재공제아조골흡수료효상차이무통계학의의。결론 Vector치료의응용우아주번판술치료만성아주염적료효우우단순번판술。
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of flap surgery with VectorTM-ultrasonic system. Methods Thirty Seven patients with chronic periodontitis were recruited into this study,with a total of 84 teeth in which probing depth of two sites was over 5 mm.The subj ects were randomized into two groups. After scaling and root planning in six weeks,the experimental group received flap surgery with VectorTM-ultrasonic system,while the control group received flap surgery only.For both groups,the following inde-xes were recorded at the time of baseline (before root planning),3 month and 6 months after the treat-ment:probing depth (PD),clinical attachment loss (CAL),plaque index (PLI)and sulcus bleeding index (SBI).Results At the time of 3 and 6 months after the treatment,both groups showed significant im-provement in their examined indexes.The experiment group showed a greater gain in PD and CAL com-pared with the control group at 1 and 3 months,though there were no significantly difference in PD,PLI and SBI between the two groups at the time 3 and 6 months (P>0.05).There was significant difference in CAL between the two groups at the time 3 and 6 months (P <0.05).Conclusion Following both thera-peutic modalities,there were marked clinical improvements for the chronic periodontitis at the time of both 3 and 6 months compared with base line.And flap surgery with VectorTM-ultrasonic system is more effective.