采矿与安全工程学报
採礦與安全工程學報
채광여안전공정학보
JOURNAL OF MINING AND SAFETY ENGINEERING
2014年
6期
869-875
,共7页
李守国%吕进国%姜耀东%姜文忠
李守國%呂進國%薑耀東%薑文忠
리수국%려진국%강요동%강문충
逆断层%断层倾角%冲击地压%支承压力%弹性能%顶板下沉量
逆斷層%斷層傾角%遲擊地壓%支承壓力%彈性能%頂闆下沉量
역단층%단층경각%충격지압%지승압력%탄성능%정판하침량
thrust fault%fault dip angle%coal bump%abutment pressure%elastic energy%roof subsidence
归纳了易造成冲击地压发生的主控参量,分析了断层倾角对冲击效应的力学机理,建立了逆断层简化模型,研究了不同断层倾角条件下的应力场、能量场、顶板下沉量等诱冲因素对冲击地压的基本作用规律。研究表明:上盘开采时,断层倾角小于45°的工作面超前支承压力峰值、弹性能峰值及顶板下沉量随断层倾角的增大而增大,大于45°时随断层倾角的增大而减小;下盘开采时,工作面超前支承压力峰值随断层倾角的增大而减小,且断层倾角为60°及75°时,工作面超前支承压力峰值前移,增加了冲击危险性;断层倾角大于45°的工作面前方弹性能峰值及顶板下沉量随断层倾角的增大而减小,小于45°的随断层倾角的增大而增大。无论上盘或下盘开采,断层区域弹性能及垂直应力都随着断层倾角的增加而增加。总体而言,断层倾角对下盘开采影响比上盘大。
歸納瞭易造成遲擊地壓髮生的主控參量,分析瞭斷層傾角對遲擊效應的力學機理,建立瞭逆斷層簡化模型,研究瞭不同斷層傾角條件下的應力場、能量場、頂闆下沉量等誘遲因素對遲擊地壓的基本作用規律。研究錶明:上盤開採時,斷層傾角小于45°的工作麵超前支承壓力峰值、彈性能峰值及頂闆下沉量隨斷層傾角的增大而增大,大于45°時隨斷層傾角的增大而減小;下盤開採時,工作麵超前支承壓力峰值隨斷層傾角的增大而減小,且斷層傾角為60°及75°時,工作麵超前支承壓力峰值前移,增加瞭遲擊危險性;斷層傾角大于45°的工作麵前方彈性能峰值及頂闆下沉量隨斷層傾角的增大而減小,小于45°的隨斷層傾角的增大而增大。無論上盤或下盤開採,斷層區域彈性能及垂直應力都隨著斷層傾角的增加而增加。總體而言,斷層傾角對下盤開採影響比上盤大。
귀납료역조성충격지압발생적주공삼량,분석료단층경각대충격효응적역학궤리,건립료역단층간화모형,연구료불동단층경각조건하적응력장、능량장、정판하침량등유충인소대충격지압적기본작용규률。연구표명:상반개채시,단층경각소우45°적공작면초전지승압력봉치、탄성능봉치급정판하침량수단층경각적증대이증대,대우45°시수단층경각적증대이감소;하반개채시,공작면초전지승압력봉치수단층경각적증대이감소,차단층경각위60°급75°시,공작면초전지승압력봉치전이,증가료충격위험성;단층경각대우45°적공작면전방탄성능봉치급정판하침량수단층경각적증대이감소,소우45°적수단층경각적증대이증대。무론상반혹하반개채,단층구역탄성능급수직응력도수착단층경각적증가이증가。총체이언,단층경각대하반개채영향비상반대。
In this paper, the main control parameters for coal bumps were generalized, and the me-chanical mechanism of coal bump induced by fault dip. In addition, the simplified model of thrust fault was constructed, and the effect law of stress field, energy field and roof subsidence, etc., that inducing coal bump was simulated and studied in the conditions of different fault dip angles. The results show that when mining in the hanging wall, the peak abutment pressure, peak elastic energy and roof subsid-ence increase with the increase of fault dip in the condition of fault dip smaller than 45°, and while the fault dip is greater than 45°, the opposite results will be obtained. When mining in the footwall, the peak abutment pressure in front of the face decreases with the increase of fault angle. While the fault dip is 60° or 75°, the peak abutment pressure moves forward, which will raise the coal bump risk. The peak elastic energy and roof subsidence ahead of the face decrease with the increase of fault dip in the condi-tion of fault dip smaller than 45°, and while the fault dip is greater than 45°, the opposite results will be obtained. Whether mining in hanging wall or footwall, the elastic energy and vertical stress in the fault area will increase with the increase of fault dip angle. In a word, fault dip angle has a greater influence to coal face when mining in the footwall.