农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2014年
8期
236-250
,共15页
农产品%标准%信息系统%追溯%法律%实施
農產品%標準%信息繫統%追溯%法律%實施
농산품%표준%신식계통%추소%법률%실시
agricultural products%standards%information systems%traceability%law%implement
确保安全和提升品质是现阶段世界范围内农产品的两大主题。基于现代信息科技及物联网技术的农产品追溯机制主要涉及两方面功用,一方面通过将供应链的相关信息透明化,最大程度降低生产者和消费者之间的信息不对称;另一方面通过在农产品供应链上下游实现追踪和溯源两大功能,推进农产品安全责任制,迎合了人们对农产品安全和品质的需求,引起了世界范围内的广泛重视,纷纷予以推动和实施。该文从追溯法律与法规、标准与规范、推动与实施3个层面阐述了欧美、日韩及台湾等世界主要农业发达地区农产品追溯体系的推进和最新发展情况,在列举典型追溯系统实例的基础上对比分析并总结了各自发展的特点,指出综合与精简是农产品追溯体系的发展方向,最后从机构、立法、标准、实施、验证等多个角度对中国农产品追溯体系的进一步发展、推广与深化提出建议,以期真正发挥追溯体系效用、守护国人健康。
確保安全和提升品質是現階段世界範圍內農產品的兩大主題。基于現代信息科技及物聯網技術的農產品追溯機製主要涉及兩方麵功用,一方麵通過將供應鏈的相關信息透明化,最大程度降低生產者和消費者之間的信息不對稱;另一方麵通過在農產品供應鏈上下遊實現追蹤和溯源兩大功能,推進農產品安全責任製,迎閤瞭人們對農產品安全和品質的需求,引起瞭世界範圍內的廣汎重視,紛紛予以推動和實施。該文從追溯法律與法規、標準與規範、推動與實施3箇層麵闡述瞭歐美、日韓及檯灣等世界主要農業髮達地區農產品追溯體繫的推進和最新髮展情況,在列舉典型追溯繫統實例的基礎上對比分析併總結瞭各自髮展的特點,指齣綜閤與精簡是農產品追溯體繫的髮展方嚮,最後從機構、立法、標準、實施、驗證等多箇角度對中國農產品追溯體繫的進一步髮展、推廣與深化提齣建議,以期真正髮揮追溯體繫效用、守護國人健康。
학보안전화제승품질시현계단세계범위내농산품적량대주제。기우현대신식과기급물련망기술적농산품추소궤제주요섭급량방면공용,일방면통과장공응련적상관신식투명화,최대정도강저생산자화소비자지간적신식불대칭;령일방면통과재농산품공응련상하유실현추종화소원량대공능,추진농산품안전책임제,영합료인문대농산품안전화품질적수구,인기료세계범위내적엄범중시,분분여이추동화실시。해문종추소법률여법규、표준여규범、추동여실시3개층면천술료구미、일한급태만등세계주요농업발체지구농산품추소체계적추진화최신발전정황,재열거전형추소계통실례적기출상대비분석병총결료각자발전적특점,지출종합여정간시농산품추소체계적발전방향,최후종궤구、입법、표준、실시、험증등다개각도대중국농산품추소체계적진일보발전、추엄여심화제출건의,이기진정발휘추소체계효용、수호국인건강。
Nowadays, agri-products production and distribution systems are becoming more and more interdependent, integrated, and globalized. The two main themes toward agri-products around the modern world include maintaining safety and improving quality. Based on the information communication technologies (ICTs) and the internet of things (IOT) technologies, traceability through the entire agri-products supply chain will effectively address safety, quality, and defense issues of agri-products by providing precise, real-time, transparent, and reliable information from the farm to the table. Traceability systems are capable of minimizing the degree of information asymmetry between producers and consumers by collecting and sharing information among all partners of the supply chain, promoting the agri-products safety responsibility by implement track and trace functions along the supply chain, and helping strengthen confidence of the customers toward agri-products. Since traceability systems are becoming an important tool for monitoring and managing agri-product flows through the supply chains, many developing and developed countries around the world put great focus on them and try to introduce traceability into various kinds of agri-products supply chains. This review described and summarized the latest progress of the agri-products traceability development in the most advanced regions of agriculture produce all over the world, which comprised three main aspects:laws and regulations, standards and norms, and promotion and implementation. <br> The agri-product traceability legal system has been developed in the Europe Union (EU), which puts "No. 178/2002 Act"at its core. It is divided into two levels:the upper level is the basic laws that set general principles, relatively; the lower level is specific articles and requirements for different kinds of agri-products based on the upper level. The EU started the Promoting European Traceability Excellence&Research (PETER) project from 2002, which was composed of a consortium of nine members coordinating nine traceability research projects, such as SEAFOODplus, FoodTrace, et al. In the United States, the “H.R. 3448 Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002”and“H.R. 2751 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act”are the two traceability acts of great importance. It started the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) in 2005, but turned to Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) and focused on the traceability for the livestock moving interstate due to high cost and the cumbersome process of NAIS in 2011. The IFT of the US had launched the Global Food Traceability Center in July 2013. It will serve as an unbiased, knowledgeable, and science-based advisor that advances insight and understanding of food traceability and focuses on eliminating the gaps in the research, development, and the need for implementation of system-wide food traceability. Canada published a new“Safe Food for Canadians Act”to strengthen food traceability in 2012 and established the Can-Trace agency to promote food traceability early in 2004. In 2013, Canada proposed the“Safe Food for Canadians Action Plan (SFCAP)” to improve the food safety system further. Japan had established a comprehensive food safety law system, but only published two traceability acts for beef and rice. The Food Marketing Research&Information Center (FMRIC) developed a number of standards and guidelines for several kinds of agri-products, such as beef, pork, fish, chicken, fruit, and vegetables. Japan promotes agri-product traceability with the audit and certification system to ensure the authenticity and integrity of traceability information. The traceability laws in Korea include:the “Food Safety Basic Act”, the “Food Sanity Act”, the “High Quality Agri-product Bill”, the “Agri-product Quality Control Act” and the “Cow and Beef Traceability Act”. The Korea Rural Development Administration (RDA) began a series of pilot traceability projects from 2004, and promoted agricultural traceability in large scale in 2006. Today, several representative traceability system are running well in Korea, such as cattle, pig, fish, et al. Taiwan started agri-product traceability in 2004 and published the“Agricultural Production and Certification Act”to develop food traceability formally in 2007. Based on amendments of several traceability laws and standards, Taiwan launched “The Project of Traceability Cloud Application on Safe Food” to integrate small traceability systems into one system in November 2013. <br> Conclusions can be drawn based on the above mentioned review:Improvement of the legal system and constantly retroactive amendments and improvements; Development of detailed traceability standards and specifications;Combination of mandatory or voluntary certification (verification) mechanism; Establishment of full-time regulatory agencies at the national level;Combination of mandatory promotion at the national level and voluntary establishment at industry level;Development of information system integration and refinement of trace items are the development trends. China could draw lessons from these systems from the world’s most advanced regions of agriculture produce in agri-product traceability developments, and it will promote the more advanced agri-product traceability system for ourselves.