甘蔗糖业
甘蔗糖業
감자당업
SUGARCANE AND CANESUGAR
2012年
5期
13-25
,共13页
谭显平%周英明%刘军%王果%陈政%李刚
譚顯平%週英明%劉軍%王果%陳政%李剛
담현평%주영명%류군%왕과%진정%리강
播种量%农艺性状%商品性状%工艺性状。
播種量%農藝性狀%商品性狀%工藝性狀。
파충량%농예성상%상품성상%공예성상。
Seeding rate%Agronomic characters%Commercial characters%Technological characters
研究结果表明:播种270000芽/hm2,对果蔗出苗率和分蘖率有极轻微负效应,但使出苗数和分蘖数显著增加,植株明显增高,茎径增大最明显,单株重显著增重,有效茎显著增多,甘蔗产量增产极显著,蔗茎更泡脆,商品性状和工艺性状变好,对抗逆性几无影响,其成本最低,单位成本增产最多,效益最好,故无论是全茎作种还是蔗尖作种,该播种量都可作为果蔗生产上首选的播种量;播种360000芽/hm2,对果蔗出苗率、分蘖率都有轻微负效应,但使出苗数和分蘖数增加极显著,株高明显增高,茎径增大第2,单株重显著增重,有效茎显著增多,甘蔗产量增产极显著,蔗茎更泡脆,商品性状和工艺性状变好,对抗逆性无不利影响,又其成本第2,单位成本增产第2,效益第2,故无论是蔗茎作种还是蔗尖作种,该播种量都可作为果蔗生产上第2选择的播种量;播种450000芽/hm2,对果蔗出苗率、分蘖率均有轻微负效应,但使出苗数增加1倍以上,分蘖数增加近1倍,株高明显增高,茎径增大第3,单株重显著增重,有效茎极显著增多,甘蔗产量增产极显著,蔗茎更泡脆,商品性状和工艺性状变好,对抗逆性无不利影响,又其成本最高,单位成本增产第3,效益第3,故该播种量只能在蔗尖作种时采用,蔗茎作种时则不宜采用。
研究結果錶明:播種270000芽/hm2,對果蔗齣苗率和分蘗率有極輕微負效應,但使齣苗數和分蘗數顯著增加,植株明顯增高,莖徑增大最明顯,單株重顯著增重,有效莖顯著增多,甘蔗產量增產極顯著,蔗莖更泡脆,商品性狀和工藝性狀變好,對抗逆性幾無影響,其成本最低,單位成本增產最多,效益最好,故無論是全莖作種還是蔗尖作種,該播種量都可作為果蔗生產上首選的播種量;播種360000芽/hm2,對果蔗齣苗率、分蘗率都有輕微負效應,但使齣苗數和分蘗數增加極顯著,株高明顯增高,莖徑增大第2,單株重顯著增重,有效莖顯著增多,甘蔗產量增產極顯著,蔗莖更泡脆,商品性狀和工藝性狀變好,對抗逆性無不利影響,又其成本第2,單位成本增產第2,效益第2,故無論是蔗莖作種還是蔗尖作種,該播種量都可作為果蔗生產上第2選擇的播種量;播種450000芽/hm2,對果蔗齣苗率、分蘗率均有輕微負效應,但使齣苗數增加1倍以上,分蘗數增加近1倍,株高明顯增高,莖徑增大第3,單株重顯著增重,有效莖極顯著增多,甘蔗產量增產極顯著,蔗莖更泡脆,商品性狀和工藝性狀變好,對抗逆性無不利影響,又其成本最高,單位成本增產第3,效益第3,故該播種量隻能在蔗尖作種時採用,蔗莖作種時則不宜採用。
연구결과표명:파충270000아/hm2,대과자출묘솔화분얼솔유겁경미부효응,단사출묘수화분얼수현저증가,식주명현증고,경경증대최명현,단주중현저증중,유효경현저증다,감자산량증산겁현저,자경경포취,상품성상화공예성상변호,대항역성궤무영향,기성본최저,단위성본증산최다,효익최호,고무론시전경작충환시자첨작충,해파충량도가작위과자생산상수선적파충량;파충360000아/hm2,대과자출묘솔、분얼솔도유경미부효응,단사출묘수화분얼수증가겁현저,주고명현증고,경경증대제2,단주중현저증중,유효경현저증다,감자산량증산겁현저,자경경포취,상품성상화공예성상변호,대항역성무불리영향,우기성본제2,단위성본증산제2,효익제2,고무론시자경작충환시자첨작충,해파충량도가작위과자생산상제2선택적파충량;파충450000아/hm2,대과자출묘솔、분얼솔균유경미부효응,단사출묘수증가1배이상,분얼수증가근1배,주고명현증고,경경증대제3,단주중현저증중,유효경겁현저증다,감자산량증산겁현저,자경경포취,상품성상화공예성상변호,대항역성무불리영향,우기성본최고,단위성본증산제3,효익제3,고해파충량지능재자첨작충시채용,자경작충시칙불의채용。
Seeding rate of 270000 buds/hm2 would cause somewhat negative effect to emergence rate, but bring about outstanding increase in the number of seedling and tillering. There would be much increase in stalk height, stalk diameter, stalk weight and millable stalks. As a result, the yield would increase outstandingly with the best benefit and the least costs. It would present good commercial and technical traits and no negative effect to resistance of adversity and therefore it would be the best choice for seeding rate. Seeding rate of 360000 buds/hm2 would cause somewhat negative effect to both emergency rate and tillering rate, but it would bring about outstanding increase in the number of seedling and tillering. Obvious increase in stalk height would be obtained. Increase in stalk diameter ranked second. Stalk weight, millable stalk and cane yield increased considerably. It would present good commercial and technical traits and no negative effect to resistance of adversity. The cost, increase in cane yield per unit cost and benefit also ranked second and therefore it would be a secondary choice for seeding rate. Seeding rate of 450000 buds/hm2 would cause somewhat negative effect to both emergency rate and tillering rate, but the number of seedling and the number of tillering were almost doubled compared with the check. There would be obvious increase in stalk height, and the stalk diameter ranked third. Stalk weight and cane yield increased considerably. It would present good commercial and technical traits and no negative effect to resistance of adversity. Its cost was the highest, the increase in cane yield per unit cost and benefit ranked third, therefore this seeding rate would only be applied when using cane tops for seeds. It is not recommended when whole stalks were used for seeds.