中国土地科学
中國土地科學
중국토지과학
HINA LAND SCIENCE
2012年
9期
35-40
,共6页
董光龙%苏航%郑新奇%刘润润%薛景丽
董光龍%囌航%鄭新奇%劉潤潤%薛景麗
동광룡%소항%정신기%류윤윤%설경려
土地利用%集约%评价指标体系%结构方程模型%开发区
土地利用%集約%評價指標體繫%結構方程模型%開髮區
토지이용%집약%평개지표체계%결구방정모형%개발구
land utilization%intensive%evaluation indicator system%structure equation model%development zone
研究目的:依据全国国家级非高新开发区数据样本,对非高新开发区土地集约利用评价指标体系的合理性和科学性进行定量分析。研究方法:结构方程模型。研究结果:只有5个指标的因子荷载小于0.3,未能很好地解释其对应的潜变量;其他的因子荷载均在0.3和1之间,很好地解释了其对应的潜变量,指标选取较合理。土地利用状况和管理绩效之间的相关系数为0.98,偏高。研究结论:用地效益评价指标选取得较好,用地结构的评价指标次之,管理绩效评价指标的选取欠佳。整体来看,非高新开发区土地集约利用评价指标体系总体比较合理,只有个别指标的归类需要优化,该指标体系能够客观合理地评价开发区集约利用程度。
研究目的:依據全國國傢級非高新開髮區數據樣本,對非高新開髮區土地集約利用評價指標體繫的閤理性和科學性進行定量分析。研究方法:結構方程模型。研究結果:隻有5箇指標的因子荷載小于0.3,未能很好地解釋其對應的潛變量;其他的因子荷載均在0.3和1之間,很好地解釋瞭其對應的潛變量,指標選取較閤理。土地利用狀況和管理績效之間的相關繫數為0.98,偏高。研究結論:用地效益評價指標選取得較好,用地結構的評價指標次之,管理績效評價指標的選取欠佳。整體來看,非高新開髮區土地集約利用評價指標體繫總體比較閤理,隻有箇彆指標的歸類需要優化,該指標體繫能夠客觀閤理地評價開髮區集約利用程度。
연구목적:의거전국국가급비고신개발구수거양본,대비고신개발구토지집약이용평개지표체계적합이성화과학성진행정량분석。연구방법:결구방정모형。연구결과:지유5개지표적인자하재소우0.3,미능흔호지해석기대응적잠변량;기타적인자하재균재0.3화1지간,흔호지해석료기대응적잠변량,지표선취교합리。토지이용상황화관리적효지간적상관계수위0.98,편고。연구결론:용지효익평개지표선취득교호,용지결구적평개지표차지,관리적효평개지표적선취흠가。정체래간,비고신개발구토지집약이용평개지표체계총체비교합리,지유개별지표적귀류수요우화,해지표체계능구객관합리지평개개발구집약이용정도。
The aim of this study is to quantitatively analyze the rationality and scientific nature of the indicator system for evaluating the land use intensity in the industry development zones excluding the Hi-tech ones. Method of Structure Equation Model was employed. The results show that the load factor values of only 5 to 14 observable indicators are below 0.3, which means they cannot explain the corresponding latent variables well. The load factor values of other observable indicators show that the choice of the indicators is reasonable. The correlation of the coefficients between Land Use structure and choice of the evaluation management performance need to be ameliorated, Management Performance is somehow high, given the value at 0.98. It is concluded that the indicators of land use efficiency is better than that of the land use structure, and the is the worst. Generally, the evaluation indicator system is reasonable and only some indicators i.e. the system can objectively and reasonably evaluate the intensity of land uses in the development zones.