国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2013年
20期
3189-3191
,共3页
常规生化%血清%肝素抗凝血浆
常規生化%血清%肝素抗凝血漿
상규생화%혈청%간소항응혈장
Routine biochemical%Serum%Heparin anticoagulant plasma%Difference
目的 探析肝素抗凝血浆和血清进行常规生化指标检测的差异性.方法 入选50例健康志愿者,对每例受试者采用促凝管和肝素锂管真空管收集肝素抗凝血浆和血清样本,检测28项常规生化指标,比较并分析差异.结果 所有指标中,13项血浆和血清结果比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),但有15项结果比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),尤其是K+(3.52±0.21 vs.3.75±0.27)mmol/L、TP(80.08±3.52 vs.74.92±3.42) g/L、AST(16.33±2.76 vs.20.86±3.09) U/L、AFU(32.22±1.44vs.34.11±1.67)U/L和CK-MB(16.44±0.41 vs.17.21±0.56) U/L,比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论 肝素抗凝血浆和血清进行常规生化检测存在差异,不可简单的替代,同时运用于临床时建议建立不同的参考范围.
目的 探析肝素抗凝血漿和血清進行常規生化指標檢測的差異性.方法 入選50例健康誌願者,對每例受試者採用促凝管和肝素鋰管真空管收集肝素抗凝血漿和血清樣本,檢測28項常規生化指標,比較併分析差異.結果 所有指標中,13項血漿和血清結果比較差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05),但有15項結果比較差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05),尤其是K+(3.52±0.21 vs.3.75±0.27)mmol/L、TP(80.08±3.52 vs.74.92±3.42) g/L、AST(16.33±2.76 vs.20.86±3.09) U/L、AFU(32.22±1.44vs.34.11±1.67)U/L和CK-MB(16.44±0.41 vs.17.21±0.56) U/L,比較差異有統計學意義(P＜0.01).結論 肝素抗凝血漿和血清進行常規生化檢測存在差異,不可簡單的替代,同時運用于臨床時建議建立不同的參攷範圍.
목적 탐석간소항응혈장화혈청진행상규생화지표검측적차이성.방법 입선50례건강지원자,대매례수시자채용촉응관화간소리관진공관수집간소항응혈장화혈청양본,검측28항상규생화지표,비교병분석차이.결과 소유지표중,13항혈장화혈청결과비교차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05),단유15항결과비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05),우기시K+(3.52±0.21 vs.3.75±0.27)mmol/L、TP(80.08±3.52 vs.74.92±3.42) g/L、AST(16.33±2.76 vs.20.86±3.09) U/L、AFU(32.22±1.44vs.34.11±1.67)U/L화CK-MB(16.44±0.41 vs.17.21±0.56) U/L,비교차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01).결론 간소항응혈장화혈청진행상규생화검측존재차이,불가간단적체대,동시운용우림상시건의건립불동적삼고범위.
Objective To analyze the difference of conventional biochemical indicators detection results between heparin anticoagulant plasma and serum.Methods We chose 50 cases of healthy volunteers and collected heparin anticoagulant plasma and serum samples to detect 28 conventional routine biochemical indexes and compared the difference.Results Among all indexes 13 items of plasma and serum had no significant difference (P＞ 0.05),but there were 15 item results showing significant difference (P＜0.05).Especially K (3.52 ± 0.21 vs.3.75 ± 0.27) mmol/L,TP (80.08 ± 3.52 vs.74.92 ± 3.42) g/L,AST (16.33 ± 2.76 vs.20.86 ± 3.09) U/L,AFU (32.22 ± 1.44 vs.34.11 ± 1.67) U/L and CK-MB (16.44 ± 0.41vs.17.21 ± 0.56) U/L items had quite differences (P＜0.01).Conclusion Heparin anticoagulant plasma and serum have differences in conventional biochemical inspection.They shouldn't be replaced reciprocally.When they are used in clinic,we recommend to establish different reference ranges.
