时间频率学报
時間頻率學報
시간빈솔학보
JOURNAL OF TIME AND FREQUENCY
2012年
2期
112-119
,共8页
何在民%胡永辉%武建锋%马红皎%王继刚%王康
何在民%鬍永輝%武建鋒%馬紅皎%王繼剛%王康
하재민%호영휘%무건봉%마홍교%왕계강%왕강
BPSK-R信号%BOC信号%码跟踪环路%S曲线%自相关函数
BPSK-R信號%BOC信號%碼跟蹤環路%S麯線%自相關函數
BPSK-R신호%BOC신호%마근종배로%S곡선%자상관함수
BPSK-R signal%BOC signal%code tracking loop%S curve%autocorrelation function
分析了射频前端带宽与BOC信号自相关函数的关系,研究了射频前端带宽和早迟码间距对S曲线的影响。在规范的TOA误差估计模型框架下,采用非相干延时码跟踪锁定环,推导出非相干延时锁定环理论计算的码跟踪误差与射频前端带宽、早迟码间距、载噪比、积分时间和码环路带宽之间的关系表达式,从而定量地分析了非相干延时锁定环的码跟踪误差。最后对BPSK-R信号和BOC(10,5)信号的码跟踪性能做了比较,比较表明,BOC(10,5)信号的码跟踪性能优于传统的BPSK-R信号,在相同的码跟踪精度条件下,BOC(10,5)比10.23 MHz BPSK-R信号所需要的载噪比约低7 dB,比1.023 MHz BPSK-R信号低15 dB左右。
分析瞭射頻前耑帶寬與BOC信號自相關函數的關繫,研究瞭射頻前耑帶寬和早遲碼間距對S麯線的影響。在規範的TOA誤差估計模型框架下,採用非相榦延時碼跟蹤鎖定環,推導齣非相榦延時鎖定環理論計算的碼跟蹤誤差與射頻前耑帶寬、早遲碼間距、載譟比、積分時間和碼環路帶寬之間的關繫錶達式,從而定量地分析瞭非相榦延時鎖定環的碼跟蹤誤差。最後對BPSK-R信號和BOC(10,5)信號的碼跟蹤性能做瞭比較,比較錶明,BOC(10,5)信號的碼跟蹤性能優于傳統的BPSK-R信號,在相同的碼跟蹤精度條件下,BOC(10,5)比10.23 MHz BPSK-R信號所需要的載譟比約低7 dB,比1.023 MHz BPSK-R信號低15 dB左右。
분석료사빈전단대관여BOC신호자상관함수적관계,연구료사빈전단대관화조지마간거대S곡선적영향。재규범적TOA오차고계모형광가하,채용비상간연시마근종쇄정배,추도출비상간연시쇄정배이론계산적마근종오차여사빈전단대관、조지마간거、재조비、적분시간화마배로대관지간적관계표체식,종이정량지분석료비상간연시쇄정배적마근종오차。최후대BPSK-R신호화BOC(10,5)신호적마근종성능주료비교,비교표명,BOC(10,5)신호적마근종성능우우전통적BPSK-R신호,재상동적마근종정도조건하,BOC(10,5)비10.23 MHz BPSK-R신호소수요적재조비약저7 dB,비1.023 MHz BPSK-R신호저15 dB좌우。
The relationship between the autocorrelation function of BOC signal and the radio-frequency front-end bandwidth is analyzed,and the influence of radio-frequency front-end bandwidth and spacing between early code and late code on the S curve is studied.Under the canonical model framework of TOA error estimation and with the no-coherent delay lock loop,a quantitative formula which relates the theoretically calculated code tracking error to the RF front-end bandwidth,spacing between early code and late code,carrier to noise ratio,integration time and code loop bandwidth,is derived leading to a quantitative analysis of the code tracking error for non-coherent delay lock loop.Finally,a comparison between the code tracking performance of BPSK-R signal and that of BOC(10,5) signal is made.The comparison shows that the BOC(10,5) signal code tracking performance is indeed superior to that of the traditional BPSK-R signal,and that to achieve the same code tracking accuracy,the required carrier to noise ratio for BOC(10,5) signal is ~7 dB lower than that for 10.23 MHz BPSK-R signal and~15 dB lower than that for 1.023 MHz BPSK-R signal.