中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版)
中華實驗和臨床感染病雜誌(電子版)
중화실험화림상감염병잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2014年
2期
168-172
,共5页
张健%蔺淑梅%杨雪亮%孔颖%唐甜甜%张曦%叶峰%刘小静
張健%藺淑梅%楊雪亮%孔穎%唐甜甜%張晞%葉峰%劉小靜
장건%린숙매%양설량%공영%당첨첨%장희%협봉%류소정
失代偿期%原发性肝癌%肝炎病毒,乙型%治疗%生存分析
失代償期%原髮性肝癌%肝炎病毒,乙型%治療%生存分析
실대상기%원발성간암%간염병독,을형%치료%생존분석
Decompensated%Hepatocellular carcinoma%Hepatitis B virus%Therapy%Survival analysis
目的:探讨肝功能失代偿期的乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)相关肝细胞癌(HCC)患者在介入治疗、射频消融治疗及内科保肝等治疗方案的基础上联合抗HBV治疗的获益情况。方法收集整理近7年来于本院住院治疗的133例肝功能失代偿期的HBV相关HCC患者的病历资料,统计在不同治疗方案下患者的生存情况,运用统计学方法进行生存分析。结果在进行保肝治疗、射频治疗及介入治疗的同时,联合核苷(酸)类似物(NAs)抗病毒治疗的患者生存时间较单独应用上述几种治疗方法的患者生存时间延长:单纯内科保肝治疗的患者中位生存期为4个月,而在单纯内科保肝治疗基础上加用NAs抗病毒治疗者中位生存期为7个月;射频治疗者为8.5个月,射频治疗的同时联合NAs抗病毒者为12个月;介入治疗者中位生存期为7个月,介入治疗的同时加用NAs抗病毒治疗者为13个月。抗病毒治疗组与未抗病毒治疗组生存率差异有统计学意义(内科治疗与内科加抗病毒治疗方案比较,χ2=7.35,P=0.007;射频治疗与射频加抗病毒治疗方案比较,χ2=11.78,P=0.001;介入治疗与介入加抗病毒治疗方案比较,χ2=16.43,P=0.000)。结论给予肝功能失代偿期的HBV相关HCC患者抗病毒治疗能够延长其生存期,可使患者获益。
目的:探討肝功能失代償期的乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)相關肝細胞癌(HCC)患者在介入治療、射頻消融治療及內科保肝等治療方案的基礎上聯閤抗HBV治療的穫益情況。方法收集整理近7年來于本院住院治療的133例肝功能失代償期的HBV相關HCC患者的病歷資料,統計在不同治療方案下患者的生存情況,運用統計學方法進行生存分析。結果在進行保肝治療、射頻治療及介入治療的同時,聯閤覈苷(痠)類似物(NAs)抗病毒治療的患者生存時間較單獨應用上述幾種治療方法的患者生存時間延長:單純內科保肝治療的患者中位生存期為4箇月,而在單純內科保肝治療基礎上加用NAs抗病毒治療者中位生存期為7箇月;射頻治療者為8.5箇月,射頻治療的同時聯閤NAs抗病毒者為12箇月;介入治療者中位生存期為7箇月,介入治療的同時加用NAs抗病毒治療者為13箇月。抗病毒治療組與未抗病毒治療組生存率差異有統計學意義(內科治療與內科加抗病毒治療方案比較,χ2=7.35,P=0.007;射頻治療與射頻加抗病毒治療方案比較,χ2=11.78,P=0.001;介入治療與介入加抗病毒治療方案比較,χ2=16.43,P=0.000)。結論給予肝功能失代償期的HBV相關HCC患者抗病毒治療能夠延長其生存期,可使患者穫益。
목적:탐토간공능실대상기적을형간염병독(HBV)상관간세포암(HCC)환자재개입치료、사빈소융치료급내과보간등치료방안적기출상연합항HBV치료적획익정황。방법수집정리근7년래우본원주원치료적133례간공능실대상기적HBV상관HCC환자적병력자료,통계재불동치료방안하환자적생존정황,운용통계학방법진행생존분석。결과재진행보간치료、사빈치료급개입치료적동시,연합핵감(산)유사물(NAs)항병독치료적환자생존시간교단독응용상술궤충치료방법적환자생존시간연장:단순내과보간치료적환자중위생존기위4개월,이재단순내과보간치료기출상가용NAs항병독치료자중위생존기위7개월;사빈치료자위8.5개월,사빈치료적동시연합NAs항병독자위12개월;개입치료자중위생존기위7개월,개입치료적동시가용NAs항병독치료자위13개월。항병독치료조여미항병독치료조생존솔차이유통계학의의(내과치료여내과가항병독치료방안비교,χ2=7.35,P=0.007;사빈치료여사빈가항병독치료방안비교,χ2=11.78,P=0.001;개입치료여개입가항병독치료방안비교,χ2=16.43,P=0.000)。결론급여간공능실대상기적HBV상관HCC환자항병독치료능구연장기생존기,가사환자획익。
Objective To investigate the result of antiviral therapy for those HBV related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who were in decompensated liver function and received interventional, radiofrequency ablation and internal medicine hepatoprotective therapies. Methods Total of 133 HBV related HCC patients with decompensated liver function were treated by different treatments in our hospital in the past 7 years. Survival analysis was performed on different treatment groups. Results Patients who received both antiviral therapy and the other therapies at the same time lived longer. Patients who got internal medicine treatment only survived for 4 months;however, patients who received internal medicine treatment plus antivival drugs got 7 months. Patients who were given radiofrequency treatment survived for 8.5 months;while patients got radiofrequency with antiviral drugs treatment survived for 12 months. The interventional therapy group survived for 7 months;and patients who were given intervention and antiviral treatment survived for 13 months. There were statistical differences between antiviral therapy group and no-antiviral therapy group. Internal medicine treatment group compared with internal medicine treatment plus antiviral therapy group (χ2=7.35, P=0.007);radiofrequency treatment compared with radiofrequency plus antiviral treatment (χ2=11.78, P=0.001) and the interventional therapy group compared with interventional therapy plus antiviral therapy (χ2 = 16.43, P = 0.000) were all with significant differences. Conclusion HBV related HCC patients with decompensated liver function got longer life if they received antiviral therapy.