中国稻米
中國稻米
중국도미
CHINA RICE
2014年
3期
17-22
,共6页
林洪鑫%袁展汽%彭春瑞%肖运萍%刘仁根%汪瑞清
林洪鑫%袁展汽%彭春瑞%肖運萍%劉仁根%汪瑞清
림홍흠%원전기%팽춘서%초운평%류인근%왕서청
水稻%超高产%行/株距比%施氮量%上部三叶%产量
水稻%超高產%行/株距比%施氮量%上部三葉%產量
수도%초고산%행/주거비%시담량%상부삼협%산량
rice%super high yield%row spacing ratio%nitrogen rate%top three leaves%yield
2011和2012年,采用再裂区设计,以超高产晚稻淦鑫688和五丰优T025为材料,在31.20万丛/hm2密度下,研究了行/株距比对不同品种产量和上部三叶形态特征的影响及两者的关系。结果表明,淦鑫688不施氮时, RS/IS(行株距比值)为2.0和2.8的处理产量显著高于比值为5.0和1.3的处理;在施氮时,RS/IS为5.0和2.0的处理产量显著高于2.8和1.3的处理。五丰优T025不施氮时的产量表现为RS/IS为1.3的处理显著高于5.0和2.8的处理;而在施氮时表现为RS/IS为5.0的处理显著高于2.0和1.3的处理。施氮时,RS/IS为2.0的处理提高了氮素积累总量和氮肥表观利用率,而RS/IS为5.0的处理降低了籽粒需氮量;不论施氮与否,两个品种在RS/IS为2.0时,倒1至倒3叶的基角、开张角和叶长较小。
2011和2012年,採用再裂區設計,以超高產晚稻淦鑫688和五豐優T025為材料,在31.20萬叢/hm2密度下,研究瞭行/株距比對不同品種產量和上部三葉形態特徵的影響及兩者的關繫。結果錶明,淦鑫688不施氮時, RS/IS(行株距比值)為2.0和2.8的處理產量顯著高于比值為5.0和1.3的處理;在施氮時,RS/IS為5.0和2.0的處理產量顯著高于2.8和1.3的處理。五豐優T025不施氮時的產量錶現為RS/IS為1.3的處理顯著高于5.0和2.8的處理;而在施氮時錶現為RS/IS為5.0的處理顯著高于2.0和1.3的處理。施氮時,RS/IS為2.0的處理提高瞭氮素積纍總量和氮肥錶觀利用率,而RS/IS為5.0的處理降低瞭籽粒需氮量;不論施氮與否,兩箇品種在RS/IS為2.0時,倒1至倒3葉的基角、開張角和葉長較小。
2011화2012년,채용재렬구설계,이초고산만도감흠688화오봉우T025위재료,재31.20만총/hm2밀도하,연구료행/주거비대불동품충산량화상부삼협형태특정적영향급량자적관계。결과표명,감흠688불시담시, RS/IS(행주거비치)위2.0화2.8적처리산량현저고우비치위5.0화1.3적처리;재시담시,RS/IS위5.0화2.0적처리산량현저고우2.8화1.3적처리。오봉우T025불시담시적산량표현위RS/IS위1.3적처리현저고우5.0화2.8적처리;이재시담시표현위RS/IS위5.0적처리현저고우2.0화1.3적처리。시담시,RS/IS위2.0적처리제고료담소적루총량화담비표관이용솔,이RS/IS위5.0적처리강저료자립수담량;불론시담여부,량개품충재RS/IS위2.0시,도1지도3협적기각、개장각화협장교소。
In 2011 and 2012, a split-plot design experiment was carried on the effects of row spacing ratio (RS/IS) on yield and top three leaves of super high-yielding late rice Wufengyou T025 and Ganxin 688 in the same planting density of 31.20 ×104 hille/hm2. The results indicated that the yield of RS/IS 2.0 and RS/IS 2.8 of Ganxin 688 were significant higher than that of RS/IS 5.0 and RS/IS 1.3 in no nitrogen condition, while the yield of RS/IS 5.0 and RS/IS 2.0 were significant higher than that of RS/IS 2.8 and RS/IS 1.3 in nitrogen condition. The yield of RS/IS 1.3 of Wufengyou T025 were significant higher than that of RS/IS 5.0 and RS/IS 2.8 in no nitrogen condition, while the yield of RS/IS 5.0 were significant higher than that of RS/IS 2.0 and RS/IS 1.3 in nitrogen condition. In nitrogen condition, RS/IS 5.0 and RS/IS 2.0 improved total amount of nitrogen accumulation and apparent nitrogen utilization, and RS/IS 5.0 decreased nitrogen demand of grain. Whether nitrogen application or not, the basic angle, stretch angle and leaf length of top three leaves of two rice cultivar in RS/IS 2.0 were small.