CAJ | 학술논문

在高职课程成绩评价方面，为坚持以人为本的理念，挖掘和发挥学生潜在价值和能力，在课程成绩评价过程中采用了增值评价法、传统考试试卷评价法，并基于该课程学习成绩测试数据，运用SPSS19．0进行了分析和讨论。同时，就这两种评价方法对两个班100名学生进行了问卷调查，得出如下结论：增值评价法与传统考试试卷评价法所产生的评价结果存在明显差异。前者在高职课程成绩评价方面更具效能，更适合以能力为本位的高职课程的教学和学生学习成绩的评价。
재고직과정성적평개방면，위견지이인위본적이념，알굴화발휘학생잠재개치화능력，재과정성적평개과정중채용료증치평개법、전통고시시권평개법，병기우해과정학습성적측시수거，운용SPSS19．0진행료분석화토론。동시，취저량충평개방법대량개반100명학생진행료문권조사，득출여하결론：증치평개법여전통고시시권평개법소산생적평개결과존재명현차이。전자재고직과정성적평개방면경구효능，경괄합이능력위본위적고직과정적교학화학생학습성적적평개。
In the evaluation of higher vocational curriculum performance ,to adhere the idea of people -oriented and excavate and play the student ’ s potential value and ability ,the author adopted the methods of value -added evalua-tion and traditional examination ,and analyzed and discussed by SPSS 19.0 based on the examination scores of this course.Meanwhile,the author also investigated 100 students of two classes on two evaluation methods .The conclu-sion was made that:there was an obvious difference between the evaluation results generated by two methods ,i.e. the former was more effectiveness in higher vocational course evaluation ,and suitable for the evaluations of higher competence-based vocational courses teaching and students ’ learning achievement .