中国药师
中國藥師
중국약사
CHINA PHARMACIST
2014年
10期
1718-1720
,共3页
排石冲剂%体外冲击波碎石术%结石
排石遲劑%體外遲擊波碎石術%結石
배석충제%체외충격파쇄석술%결석
Paishigranules%Extracorporealshockwavelithotripsy%Stones
目的：：探讨对于体外冲击波碎石术后采用排石冲剂促进排石的临床疗效。方法：采用回顾性研究方法,510例尿路结石患者按治疗方式分成观察组和对照组各255例。对照组采用体外冲击碎石术治疗,观察组在体外冲击碎石术后加用排石冲剂,比较两组结石排出率、临床疗效与药品不良反应。结果：观察组结石排出率为78.8%,明显高于对照组的51.0%( P<0.05)；观察组痊愈率72.9%,总有效率92.5%,对照组痊愈率43.9%,总有效率82.4%,两组比较差异有统计学意义( P <0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论：体外冲击波碎石术后应用排石冲剂能促进结石排出,疗效高、不良反应少。
目的：：探討對于體外遲擊波碎石術後採用排石遲劑促進排石的臨床療效。方法：採用迴顧性研究方法,510例尿路結石患者按治療方式分成觀察組和對照組各255例。對照組採用體外遲擊碎石術治療,觀察組在體外遲擊碎石術後加用排石遲劑,比較兩組結石排齣率、臨床療效與藥品不良反應。結果：觀察組結石排齣率為78.8%,明顯高于對照組的51.0%( P<0.05)；觀察組痊愈率72.9%,總有效率92.5%,對照組痊愈率43.9%,總有效率82.4%,兩組比較差異有統計學意義( P <0.05)。兩組患者不良反應髮生率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論：體外遲擊波碎石術後應用排石遲劑能促進結石排齣,療效高、不良反應少。
목적：：탐토대우체외충격파쇄석술후채용배석충제촉진배석적림상료효。방법：채용회고성연구방법,510례뇨로결석환자안치료방식분성관찰조화대조조각255례。대조조채용체외충격쇄석술치료,관찰조재체외충격쇄석술후가용배석충제,비교량조결석배출솔、림상료효여약품불량반응。결과：관찰조결석배출솔위78.8%,명현고우대조조적51.0%( P<0.05)；관찰조전유솔72.9%,총유효솔92.5%,대조조전유솔43.9%,총유효솔82.4%,량조비교차이유통계학의의( P <0.05)。량조환자불량반응발생솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론：체외충격파쇄석술후응용배석충제능촉진결석배출,료효고、불량반응소。
Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of Paishi granules on promoting stone expulsion after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy ( ESWL) . Methods:A retrospective study method was adopted. Totally 510 cases of lithangiuria patients were divided into the treatment group and the control group with 255 cases in each. The control group was treated by ESWL, and the treatment group was treated by Paishi granules after ESWL. The stone expulsion rate,clinical efficacy and adverse reactions in the two groups were stud-ied and compared. Results:The stone expulsion rate of the observation group was 78. 8%,which was significantly higher than that of the control group (51. 0%, P<0. 05). The curative rate of the observation group was 72. 9% with the total effective rate of 92. 5%, that of the control group was 43. 9% with the total efficiency of 82. 4%,and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0. 05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0. 05). Conclusion:Using Paishi granules after ESWL can promote stone expulsion with high efficacy and slight adverse reactions.
