实用医学杂志
實用醫學雜誌
실용의학잡지
THE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICINE
2014年
9期
1486-1489
,共4页
李南方%周玲%洪静%祖菲亚%张德莲%王红梅%姚晓光%王磊
李南方%週玲%洪靜%祖菲亞%張德蓮%王紅梅%姚曉光%王磊
리남방%주령%홍정%조비아%장덕련%왕홍매%요효광%왕뢰
高血压%农牧区%降压模式
高血壓%農牧區%降壓模式
고혈압%농목구%강압모식
Hypertension%Agricultural and pastoral areas%Blood pressure-lowering mode
目的:对农牧区高血压患者实施A、B两种降压模式干预,比较其干预效果,以期探索出一套农牧区高血压防治的有效模式。方法:入选新疆农牧区高血压患者1445例,采用患者自愿选择的方式分别进入A、B两种降压模式治疗。随访和记录两种模式干预患者在降压治疗过程中血压、心率、血脂、血糖等指标的变化和心脑血管事件及不良事件的发生情况,比较A、B两种降压模式实施效果。结果:(1)87.07%的患者选择了A降压模式治疗(A组),仅12.93%的患者选择了B降压治疗模式(B组)。(2)A、B组患者的血压控制率分别为70.71%、68.75%,组间差异无统计学意义。(3)降压治疗第12个月,A、B组患者的收缩压平均降低幅度分别为(19.09±20.33)、(14.14±17.85)mmHg,组间差异具有统计学意义;舒张压平均降低幅度分别为(11.17±13.23)、(8.17±11.17)mmHg,组间差异无统计学意义。结论:A降压模式能够有效地控制新疆农牧区高血压患者血压水平。
目的:對農牧區高血壓患者實施A、B兩種降壓模式榦預,比較其榦預效果,以期探索齣一套農牧區高血壓防治的有效模式。方法:入選新疆農牧區高血壓患者1445例,採用患者自願選擇的方式分彆進入A、B兩種降壓模式治療。隨訪和記錄兩種模式榦預患者在降壓治療過程中血壓、心率、血脂、血糖等指標的變化和心腦血管事件及不良事件的髮生情況,比較A、B兩種降壓模式實施效果。結果:(1)87.07%的患者選擇瞭A降壓模式治療(A組),僅12.93%的患者選擇瞭B降壓治療模式(B組)。(2)A、B組患者的血壓控製率分彆為70.71%、68.75%,組間差異無統計學意義。(3)降壓治療第12箇月,A、B組患者的收縮壓平均降低幅度分彆為(19.09±20.33)、(14.14±17.85)mmHg,組間差異具有統計學意義;舒張壓平均降低幅度分彆為(11.17±13.23)、(8.17±11.17)mmHg,組間差異無統計學意義。結論:A降壓模式能夠有效地控製新疆農牧區高血壓患者血壓水平。
목적:대농목구고혈압환자실시A、B량충강압모식간예,비교기간예효과,이기탐색출일투농목구고혈압방치적유효모식。방법:입선신강농목구고혈압환자1445례,채용환자자원선택적방식분별진입A、B량충강압모식치료。수방화기록량충모식간예환자재강압치료과정중혈압、심솔、혈지、혈당등지표적변화화심뇌혈관사건급불량사건적발생정황,비교A、B량충강압모식실시효과。결과:(1)87.07%적환자선택료A강압모식치료(A조),부12.93%적환자선택료B강압치료모식(B조)。(2)A、B조환자적혈압공제솔분별위70.71%、68.75%,조간차이무통계학의의。(3)강압치료제12개월,A、B조환자적수축압평균강저폭도분별위(19.09±20.33)、(14.14±17.85)mmHg,조간차이구유통계학의의;서장압평균강저폭도분별위(11.17±13.23)、(8.17±11.17)mmHg,조간차이무통계학의의。결론:A강압모식능구유효지공제신강농목구고혈압환자혈압수평。
Objective To explore an effective mode for the prevention and control of hypertension in agricultural and pastoral areas in Xinjiang by comparing the effect of mode A with that of B in blood pressure-lowering treatment. Methods 1445 patients with hypertension in agricultural and pastoral areas were included in this study. They voluntarily received mode A or B blood pressure-lowering treatment. The changes in heart rate , blood pressure, lipid, and glucose, and the incidences of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and adverse events were noted;and the effect of modes A and B was compared. Results 87.07%of the patients chose mode A group, while 12.93%chose mode B. The rate of pressure control was 70.71%in mode A group and 68.75%in mode B group , with no significant statistical difference (P>0.05). In 12th month of treatment, the decreased level of systolic pressure was (19.09 ± 20.33)mmHg in the group with mode A and (14.14 ± 17.85) mmHg in the group with mode B, showing a significant statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.047); and the declined level of diastolic pressure was (11.17 ± 13.23)mmHg and (8.17 ± 11.17) mmHg, respectively, with no significant statistical difference. Conclusion Mode A blood pressure-lowering treatment can effectively control blood pressure in hypertensive patients living in agricultural and pastoral areas in Xinjiang.