中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
10期
105-106
,共2页
中医%辨证%消化性溃疡
中醫%辨證%消化性潰瘍
중의%변증%소화성궤양
TCM%Differentiation%Peptic ulcer
目的：探讨消化性溃疡采用中医辨证方式治疗的疗效。方法：选取2011年2月-2013年2月收治的消化性溃疡患者106例，60例（中医组）采用中医辨证分型方式治疗，46例（西医组）采用阿莫西林与奥美拉唑联合治疗，对比两组治疗后HP转阴率、整体效果以及不良情况。结果：中医组HP阴性率93.3%，西医组仅为78.3%；中医组总有效率95.0%，治愈率71.7%；西医组总有效率78.3%，治愈率50.0%；中医组不良情况出现率为3.4%，西医组为15.2%；两组差异显著（P<0.05）。结论：消化性溃疡采用中医辨证方式治疗，效果显著，安全性佳，临床可继续推广。
目的：探討消化性潰瘍採用中醫辨證方式治療的療效。方法：選取2011年2月-2013年2月收治的消化性潰瘍患者106例，60例（中醫組）採用中醫辨證分型方式治療，46例（西醫組）採用阿莫西林與奧美拉唑聯閤治療，對比兩組治療後HP轉陰率、整體效果以及不良情況。結果：中醫組HP陰性率93.3%，西醫組僅為78.3%；中醫組總有效率95.0%，治愈率71.7%；西醫組總有效率78.3%，治愈率50.0%；中醫組不良情況齣現率為3.4%，西醫組為15.2%；兩組差異顯著（P<0.05）。結論：消化性潰瘍採用中醫辨證方式治療，效果顯著，安全性佳，臨床可繼續推廣。
목적：탐토소화성궤양채용중의변증방식치료적료효。방법：선취2011년2월-2013년2월수치적소화성궤양환자106례，60례（중의조）채용중의변증분형방식치료，46례（서의조）채용아막서림여오미랍서연합치료，대비량조치료후HP전음솔、정체효과이급불량정황。결과：중의조HP음성솔93.3%，서의조부위78.3%；중의조총유효솔95.0%，치유솔71.7%；서의조총유효솔78.3%，치유솔50.0%；중의조불량정황출현솔위3.4%，서의조위15.2%；량조차이현저（P<0.05）。결론：소화성궤양채용중의변증방식치료，효과현저，안전성가，림상가계속추엄。
Objective:To observe curative effects of TCM differentiation for peptic ulcer. Methods:106 patients were divided into 2 groups, 60 cases (the TCM group) were treated in TCM differentiation, 46 cases (the western medicine group) were treated by amoxicillin and omeprazole. Results:The HP negative rate in the TCM group was 93.3%, and the total efficiency was 95.0%, the cured rate was 71.7%, the rate of adverse conditions was 3.4%;the HP negative rate in western medicine group was 78.3%, the total efficiency was 78.3%, the cured rate was 50.0%, the rate of adverse conditions was 15.2%;there was significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion:This therapy has achieved good effects in treating peptic ulcer, and was safe, worthy of promotion.
