安徽医药
安徽醫藥
안휘의약
ANHUI MEDICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL
2014年
5期
859-863
,共5页
桂广华%吴发银%史恒峰%陈平%何琴
桂廣華%吳髮銀%史恆峰%陳平%何琴
계엄화%오발은%사항봉%진평%하금
下肢动脉%64层螺旋CT%DSA%血管造影术
下肢動脈%64層螺鏇CT%DSA%血管造影術
하지동맥%64층라선CT%DSA%혈관조영술
lower extremity artery%64-slices spiral CT%digital subtraction angiography%angiography
目的:对照数字血管减影( DSA),探讨64层螺旋CT血管成像对下肢动脉闭塞性病变的临床诊断价值。方法对48例临床疑有下肢动脉闭塞性疾病的患者行CT血管成像( CTA)检查。其中29例于检查后1周内行DSA检查。 CT扫描范围1000~1200 mm,层厚6 mm,螺距0.8,重建层厚1 mm,对比剂用量1.5 mL· kg-1,注射速率4~5 mL· s-1。 CT薄层重建数据发送至工作站进行MPR,VR及MIP重建技术,DSA采用分段进行下肢动脉造影检查。将接受两种检查方法的29例患者的CTA与DSA相同血管节段进行比较。结果以DSA为金标准,CTA诊断下肢动脉狭窄(≥50%)的灵敏度及特异度分别为92.5%(161/174)、97.1%(103/106),χ2值0.385,P值为0.984>0.05,说明CTA诊断下肢血管狭窄与DSA结果无明显差别。结论64层螺旋CT血管造影能清晰显示下肢动脉及其病变,是下肢动脉狭窄硬化性疾病的可靠评估方法。
目的:對照數字血管減影( DSA),探討64層螺鏇CT血管成像對下肢動脈閉塞性病變的臨床診斷價值。方法對48例臨床疑有下肢動脈閉塞性疾病的患者行CT血管成像( CTA)檢查。其中29例于檢查後1週內行DSA檢查。 CT掃描範圍1000~1200 mm,層厚6 mm,螺距0.8,重建層厚1 mm,對比劑用量1.5 mL· kg-1,註射速率4~5 mL· s-1。 CT薄層重建數據髮送至工作站進行MPR,VR及MIP重建技術,DSA採用分段進行下肢動脈造影檢查。將接受兩種檢查方法的29例患者的CTA與DSA相同血管節段進行比較。結果以DSA為金標準,CTA診斷下肢動脈狹窄(≥50%)的靈敏度及特異度分彆為92.5%(161/174)、97.1%(103/106),χ2值0.385,P值為0.984>0.05,說明CTA診斷下肢血管狹窄與DSA結果無明顯差彆。結論64層螺鏇CT血管造影能清晰顯示下肢動脈及其病變,是下肢動脈狹窄硬化性疾病的可靠評估方法。
목적:대조수자혈관감영( DSA),탐토64층라선CT혈관성상대하지동맥폐새성병변적림상진단개치。방법대48례림상의유하지동맥폐새성질병적환자행CT혈관성상( CTA)검사。기중29례우검사후1주내행DSA검사。 CT소묘범위1000~1200 mm,층후6 mm,라거0.8,중건층후1 mm,대비제용량1.5 mL· kg-1,주사속솔4~5 mL· s-1。 CT박층중건수거발송지공작참진행MPR,VR급MIP중건기술,DSA채용분단진행하지동맥조영검사。장접수량충검사방법적29례환자적CTA여DSA상동혈관절단진행비교。결과이DSA위금표준,CTA진단하지동맥협착(≥50%)적령민도급특이도분별위92.5%(161/174)、97.1%(103/106),χ2치0.385,P치위0.984>0.05,설명CTA진단하지혈관협착여DSA결과무명현차별。결론64층라선CT혈관조영능청석현시하지동맥급기병변,시하지동맥협착경화성질병적가고평고방법。
Objective To assess the value of 64-Slices spiral CTA with DSA comparatively in diagnosis of lower extremity arterial oc-clusive disease .Methods CTA was used to examine 48 patients with clinically suspected lower extremity arterial occlusive disease .A-mong the 48 patients,29 patients also underwent DSA examination within one week .CT was performed with scan range from 1 000 mm to 1 200 mm,thickness of 6 mm,pitch of 0.8,reconstruction thickness of 1 mm.Dosage of contrast agent was 1.5 mL· kg-1 and the in-jection rate was 4.5 mL· s-1.All images were reconstructed by multi-planar reformation (MPR),volume rendering (VR),maximum intensity projection ( MIP) in working-station respectively .Lower limb angiography was inspected subsectly by DSA .CTA and DSA data of 29 patients were compared with each other .Results DSA was taken as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnosis accuracy of CTA . The sensitivity,specificity of lower extremity arterial stenosis (vessel stenosis≥50%) were 92.5% (161/174) and 97.1% (103/106) respectively.CTA and DSA were shown no obvious difference in the diagnosis of lower extremity artery occlusive disease (χ2 =0. 385,P=0.984).Conclusions The arterial occlusive diseases in the lower extremity can be well shown by 64-slice spiral CTA,which is a reliable method for evaluating the lower extremity arterial occlusive disease .