中华老年多器官疾病杂志
中華老年多器官疾病雜誌
중화노년다기관질병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE ORGAN DISEASES IN THE ELDERLY
2013年
7期
497-499
,共3页
詹胜利%蔡明%李州利%李响%李聪然%韦星
詹勝利%蔡明%李州利%李響%李聰然%韋星
첨성리%채명%리주리%리향%리총연%위성
前列腺增生%前列腺炎%尿动力学
前列腺增生%前列腺炎%尿動力學
전렬선증생%전렬선염%뇨동역학
prostatic hyperplasia%prostatitis%urodynamics
目的探讨前列腺增生合并慢性前列腺炎患者膀胱功能的尿动力学特点。方法选取2009年6月至2012年6月在解放军第309医院住院的前列腺增生患者187例。按是否合并前列腺炎分为单纯前列腺增生组(n=91)及合并前列腺炎组(n=96)。比较两组尿动力学检查指标,包括膀胱容量、最大逼尿肌压力、膀胱稳定性及最大尿道闭合压的差异。结果两组患者测得的膀胱容量(P=0.741)、最大逼尿肌压(P=0.872)、最大尿道闭合压(P=0.590)比较差异无统计学意义;单纯前列腺增生患者的膀胱稳定性优于前列腺增生合并慢性前列腺炎患者,两组间比较差异具有统计学意义[(158.0±42.7) vs (79.6±30.0)ml,P=0.032]。结论前列腺增生合并慢性前列腺炎患者尿动力学表现主要以不稳定性膀胱为主,导致患者出现尿频、尿急、尿道不适感。
目的探討前列腺增生閤併慢性前列腺炎患者膀胱功能的尿動力學特點。方法選取2009年6月至2012年6月在解放軍第309醫院住院的前列腺增生患者187例。按是否閤併前列腺炎分為單純前列腺增生組(n=91)及閤併前列腺炎組(n=96)。比較兩組尿動力學檢查指標,包括膀胱容量、最大逼尿肌壓力、膀胱穩定性及最大尿道閉閤壓的差異。結果兩組患者測得的膀胱容量(P=0.741)、最大逼尿肌壓(P=0.872)、最大尿道閉閤壓(P=0.590)比較差異無統計學意義;單純前列腺增生患者的膀胱穩定性優于前列腺增生閤併慢性前列腺炎患者,兩組間比較差異具有統計學意義[(158.0±42.7) vs (79.6±30.0)ml,P=0.032]。結論前列腺增生閤併慢性前列腺炎患者尿動力學錶現主要以不穩定性膀胱為主,導緻患者齣現尿頻、尿急、尿道不適感。
목적탐토전렬선증생합병만성전렬선염환자방광공능적뇨동역학특점。방법선취2009년6월지2012년6월재해방군제309의원주원적전렬선증생환자187례。안시부합병전렬선염분위단순전렬선증생조(n=91)급합병전렬선염조(n=96)。비교량조뇨동역학검사지표,포괄방광용량、최대핍뇨기압력、방광은정성급최대뇨도폐합압적차이。결과량조환자측득적방광용량(P=0.741)、최대핍뇨기압(P=0.872)、최대뇨도폐합압(P=0.590)비교차이무통계학의의;단순전렬선증생환자적방광은정성우우전렬선증생합병만성전렬선염환자,량조간비교차이구유통계학의의[(158.0±42.7) vs (79.6±30.0)ml,P=0.032]。결론전렬선증생합병만성전렬선염환자뇨동역학표현주요이불은정성방광위주,도치환자출현뇨빈、뇨급、뇨도불괄감。
Objective To investigate the urodynamics of bladder function in patients suffering from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatitis. Methods One hundred and eighty-seven inpatients with BPH hospitalized in our department from June 2009 to June 2012 were recruited in this study. They were assigned to two groups according to being accompanied with prostatitis or not, that is, BPH group (n=91) and BPH combined with chronic prostatitis (CP) group (BPH/CP group, n=96). Urodynamic indices, such as maximum bladder capacity, maximum detrusor pressure, bladder stability and maximal urethral closure pressure were measured and then compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the urodynamic parameters, including maximum bladder capacity (P=0.741), maximum detrusor pressure (P=0.872) and maximal urethral closure pressure (P=0.590) between the two groups. But, simple BPH patients had better bladder stability than the BPH/CP group [(158.0±42.7) vs (79.6±30.0)ml, P=0.032]. Conclusion BPH combined with CP mainly manifests bladder instability urodynamically, which further leads to urinary frequency, urgency and discomfortableness.