中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)
中華疝和腹壁外科雜誌(電子版)
중화산화복벽외과잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF HERNIA AND ABDOMINAL WALL SURGERY(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2014年
3期
257-259
,共3页
王有财%韩广森%王刚成%王松涛%徐勇超%任莹坤%程勇%王兆洲
王有財%韓廣森%王剛成%王鬆濤%徐勇超%任瑩坤%程勇%王兆洲
왕유재%한엄삼%왕강성%왕송도%서용초%임형곤%정용%왕조주
缝线%伤口感染%手术后并发症
縫線%傷口感染%手術後併髮癥
봉선%상구감염%수술후병발증
Sutures%Wound infection%Postoperative complications
目的:观察可吸收缝线连续缝合间断打结在腹部正中切口缝合中的应用效果。方法回顾性分析2012年9~12月,郑州大学附属肿瘤医院接受腹部手术的患者70例。随机分成二组,观察组采用可吸收缝线全层连续缝合间断打结,对照组采用普通缝线间断全层缝合。比较二组患者切口感染、线结反应、脂肪液化、切口裂开的发生情况。结果术后二组均有患者出现切口红肿和渗出,观察组脂肪液化3例,感染1例,线结反应0例,切口裂开0例,经换药和充分引流、抗感染后,愈合良好;对照组脂肪液化5例,切口感染6例,线结反应15例,切口裂开0例,经换药和充分引流、抗感染后,有部分需要拆除缝线。观察组切口感染、线结反应的发生率明显低于对照组,二组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.968、20.741,P=0.026、0.000);脂肪液化二组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.565, P=0.452)。结论可吸收缝线全层连续缝合间断打结方法与普通缝线全层间断缝合方法相比具有预防切口裂开的特点,同时具备减少切口脂肪液化、感染、线结反应等发生的优点,值得推广。
目的:觀察可吸收縫線連續縫閤間斷打結在腹部正中切口縫閤中的應用效果。方法迴顧性分析2012年9~12月,鄭州大學附屬腫瘤醫院接受腹部手術的患者70例。隨機分成二組,觀察組採用可吸收縫線全層連續縫閤間斷打結,對照組採用普通縫線間斷全層縫閤。比較二組患者切口感染、線結反應、脂肪液化、切口裂開的髮生情況。結果術後二組均有患者齣現切口紅腫和滲齣,觀察組脂肪液化3例,感染1例,線結反應0例,切口裂開0例,經換藥和充分引流、抗感染後,愈閤良好;對照組脂肪液化5例,切口感染6例,線結反應15例,切口裂開0例,經換藥和充分引流、抗感染後,有部分需要拆除縫線。觀察組切口感染、線結反應的髮生率明顯低于對照組,二組比較差異有統計學意義(χ2=3.968、20.741,P=0.026、0.000);脂肪液化二組比較差異無統計學意義(χ2=0.565, P=0.452)。結論可吸收縫線全層連續縫閤間斷打結方法與普通縫線全層間斷縫閤方法相比具有預防切口裂開的特點,同時具備減少切口脂肪液化、感染、線結反應等髮生的優點,值得推廣。
목적:관찰가흡수봉선련속봉합간단타결재복부정중절구봉합중적응용효과。방법회고성분석2012년9~12월,정주대학부속종류의원접수복부수술적환자70례。수궤분성이조,관찰조채용가흡수봉선전층련속봉합간단타결,대조조채용보통봉선간단전층봉합。비교이조환자절구감염、선결반응、지방액화、절구렬개적발생정황。결과술후이조균유환자출현절구홍종화삼출,관찰조지방액화3례,감염1례,선결반응0례,절구렬개0례,경환약화충분인류、항감염후,유합량호;대조조지방액화5례,절구감염6례,선결반응15례,절구렬개0례,경환약화충분인류、항감염후,유부분수요탁제봉선。관찰조절구감염、선결반응적발생솔명현저우대조조,이조비교차이유통계학의의(χ2=3.968、20.741,P=0.026、0.000);지방액화이조비교차이무통계학의의(χ2=0.565, P=0.452)。결론가흡수봉선전층련속봉합간단타결방법여보통봉선전층간단봉합방법상비구유예방절구렬개적특점,동시구비감소절구지방액화、감염、선결반응등발생적우점,치득추엄。
Objective To observe the effect of continuous absorbable suture intermittent knotted in the middleincision of the abdomen.Methods From September 201 2 to December 201 2,70 patients accepted abdominal surgery in Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Zhengzhou University were randomized into two groups.Full-thickness continuous suture with absorbable suture interrupted knotingwas used in observation group,and the full-thickness interrupted ordinary suture was applied in control group.Both groups were compared with wound infection,knot reaction,fat liquefaction,and incidence of wound dehiscence.Results Incision swelling and oozing were occurred in both groups;the observation group had 3 cases of fat liquefaction,1 infection,no knot reaction and wound dehiscence,all of them cured by dressing,adequate drainage and antibiotic treatment;In control group,there were 5 patients with fatty liquefaction,6 cases of wound infection and 1 5 cases of knot reaction,afterdressing,adequate drainage and antibiotic treatment, several patients still needed suture removal.The wound complications and knot reaction were significantly different between two groups (χ2 =3.968,20.741 ,P =0.026,0.000 ).No significant difference was observed infatty liquefaction between two groups(χ2 =0.565,P=0.452).Conclusions Compared with full-thickness interrupted ordinary suture,continuous absorbable suture with interrupted knots was shown to have a superior prevention of wound dehiscence,and it is worth promoting because of the advantages of reducing fat liquefaction,wound infection and knot reactions as well.