世界中西医结合杂志
世界中西醫結閤雜誌
세계중서의결합잡지
WORLD JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE AND WESTERN MEDICINE
2014年
5期
501-504
,共4页
赵凌艳%陈雄%王娜娜%李雪峰%汪晓芬
趙凌豔%陳雄%王娜娜%李雪峰%汪曉芬
조릉염%진웅%왕나나%리설봉%왕효분
电针%α硫辛酸%糖尿病周围神经病
電針%α硫辛痠%糖尿病週圍神經病
전침%α류신산%당뇨병주위신경병
Electroacupuncture%α-Lipoic Acid%Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
目的:观察电针联合硫辛酸治疗2型糖尿病周围神经病变的临床疗效,并探讨其治疗机制。方法将符合病例纳入标准的120例患者随机分为电针组、药物组和联合组,各40例。电针组采用电针治疗,药物组仅采用硫辛酸注射治疗,联合组采用电针联合硫辛酸治疗。三组患者在治疗2个疗程后分别进行NCV速度测定、MNSI评分及疗效评定,比较三组临床疗效。结果三组病例经相应方法治疗2个疗程后,NCV传导速度均增快,其中联合组神经传导速度增快最明显;联合组的MNSI评分降幅高于药物组和电针组;电针组痊愈率为27.5%,总有效率为72.5%;药物组痊愈率为37.5%,总有效率为77.5%;联合组痊愈率为72.5%,总有效率为95.0%;联合组痊愈率及总有效率均明显优于电针组和药物组,三组比较差异有统计学意义( P﹤0.05)。结论电针配合硫辛酸治疗2型糖尿病周围神经病变疗效显著。
目的:觀察電針聯閤硫辛痠治療2型糖尿病週圍神經病變的臨床療效,併探討其治療機製。方法將符閤病例納入標準的120例患者隨機分為電針組、藥物組和聯閤組,各40例。電針組採用電針治療,藥物組僅採用硫辛痠註射治療,聯閤組採用電針聯閤硫辛痠治療。三組患者在治療2箇療程後分彆進行NCV速度測定、MNSI評分及療效評定,比較三組臨床療效。結果三組病例經相應方法治療2箇療程後,NCV傳導速度均增快,其中聯閤組神經傳導速度增快最明顯;聯閤組的MNSI評分降幅高于藥物組和電針組;電針組痊愈率為27.5%,總有效率為72.5%;藥物組痊愈率為37.5%,總有效率為77.5%;聯閤組痊愈率為72.5%,總有效率為95.0%;聯閤組痊愈率及總有效率均明顯優于電針組和藥物組,三組比較差異有統計學意義( P﹤0.05)。結論電針配閤硫辛痠治療2型糖尿病週圍神經病變療效顯著。
목적:관찰전침연합류신산치료2형당뇨병주위신경병변적림상료효,병탐토기치료궤제。방법장부합병례납입표준적120례환자수궤분위전침조、약물조화연합조,각40례。전침조채용전침치료,약물조부채용류신산주사치료,연합조채용전침연합류신산치료。삼조환자재치료2개료정후분별진행NCV속도측정、MNSI평분급료효평정,비교삼조림상료효。결과삼조병례경상응방법치료2개료정후,NCV전도속도균증쾌,기중연합조신경전도속도증쾌최명현;연합조적MNSI평분강폭고우약물조화전침조;전침조전유솔위27.5%,총유효솔위72.5%;약물조전유솔위37.5%,총유효솔위77.5%;연합조전유솔위72.5%,총유효솔위95.0%;연합조전유솔급총유효솔균명현우우전침조화약물조,삼조비교차이유통계학의의( P﹤0.05)。결론전침배합류신산치료2형당뇨병주위신경병변료효현저。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy on type 2 diabetes peripheral neuropathy ( type 2 DPN)treated with electroacupuncture( EA)and lipoic acid so as to explore the mechanism on treat-ment. Methods One hundred and twenty cases that met the inclusive standards were randomized into EA group,medicine group and the joint-therapy group,40 cases in each one. In EA,EA therapy was used. In the medicine group,lipoic acid injection was used. In the joint-therapy group,EA and lipoic acid were ap-plied in combination. After 2 sessions of treatment,NCV detection,MNSI scoring and efficacy evaluation were performed in the three groups. The clinical efficacy was compared among the three groups. Results After treatment for 2 sessions,NCV was increased,in which the increase in the joint-therapy group was the most obvious. The decrease amplitude of MNSI score in the joint-therapy group was higher than that in the medi-cine group and EA group. In EA group,the curative rate was 27. 5% and the total effective rate was 72. 5%. In the medicine group,the curative rate was 37. 5% and the total effective rate was 77. 5%. In the joint-therapy group,the curative rate was 72. 5% and the total effective rate was 95. 0%. The curative rate and to-tal effective rate in the joint-therapy group were superior apparently to EA group and the medicine group,in-dicating the significant difference(P﹤0. 05). Conclusion EA combined with lipoic acid achieves the sig-nificant efficacy on type 2 DPN.