医院管理论坛
醫院管理論罈
의원관이론단
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT FORUM
2013年
8期
23-27
,共5页
张卓一%黄小民%周晶晶%苏建明
張卓一%黃小民%週晶晶%囌建明
장탁일%황소민%주정정%소건명
kano模型%质量属性%急诊服务%质量改进
kano模型%質量屬性%急診服務%質量改進
kano모형%질량속성%급진복무%질량개진
Kano model%Quality attributes%Emergency services%Quality improvement
目的评价Kano模型在急诊科医疗服务质量管理中的作用。方法调查在急诊科就诊、留观的患者,应用Kano模型确定各类服务属性,分别为必备质量、一元质量、魅力质量、无差异质量和逆向质量五类,并根据重要度和满意度作象限图分析。结果根据Kano模型,得出属于必备质量25项、一元质量12项、魅力质量8项、无差异质量2项和逆向质量3项。用象限图分析位于竞争优势区25项、改进区15项、保留区6项,观察区4项。结论 Kano模型能识别急诊科各类医疗服务质量,区分不同服务的重要度和满意度,为急诊医疗服务质量改进提供依据和方向。
目的評價Kano模型在急診科醫療服務質量管理中的作用。方法調查在急診科就診、留觀的患者,應用Kano模型確定各類服務屬性,分彆為必備質量、一元質量、魅力質量、無差異質量和逆嚮質量五類,併根據重要度和滿意度作象限圖分析。結果根據Kano模型,得齣屬于必備質量25項、一元質量12項、魅力質量8項、無差異質量2項和逆嚮質量3項。用象限圖分析位于競爭優勢區25項、改進區15項、保留區6項,觀察區4項。結論 Kano模型能識彆急診科各類醫療服務質量,區分不同服務的重要度和滿意度,為急診醫療服務質量改進提供依據和方嚮。
목적평개Kano모형재급진과의료복무질량관리중적작용。방법조사재급진과취진、류관적환자,응용Kano모형학정각류복무속성,분별위필비질량、일원질량、매력질량、무차이질량화역향질량오류,병근거중요도화만의도작상한도분석。결과근거Kano모형,득출속우필비질량25항、일원질량12항、매력질량8항、무차이질량2항화역향질량3항。용상한도분석위우경쟁우세구25항、개진구15항、보류구6항,관찰구4항。결론 Kano모형능식별급진과각류의료복무질량,구분불동복무적중요도화만의도,위급진의료복무질량개진제공의거화방향。
Objectives To assess the role of Kano Model in the service quality control in the Emergency Department. Methods Patients who visited the Emergency Department and who were preserved in the observation room were surveyed. On five dimensions that the Kano model categorized, namely, the Must-be Quality, One-dimensional Quality, Attractive Quality, Indifferent Quality and Reverse Quality, the collected data were analyzed by drawing quadrantal diagrams according to the importance and satisfaction. Results In accordance with the Kano model, altogether 25 items were attributed to Must-be Quality, 12 to One-dimensional Quality, 8 to Attractive Quality, 2 to Indifferent Quality, and 3 to Reverse Quality. By quadrantal diagram analysis, it was found that 25 of them were located in the Competitive Advantage district, 15 in the Improvement district, 6 in the Reserved district, and 4 in the Observed district. Conclusions Kano model can identify the quality of different services in Emergency Department, and distinguish them by their importance and satisfaction, thus providing evidence and direction for quality improvement in emergency services.