中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2014年
7期
134-136
,共3页
杨雅清%李炎%董津平%张苏丽
楊雅清%李炎%董津平%張囌麗
양아청%리염%동진평%장소려
优质护理%普外患者%护理实践%效果观察
優質護理%普外患者%護理實踐%效果觀察
우질호리%보외환자%호리실천%효과관찰
Quality nursing%General surgery patient%Nursing practice%Effect observation
目的：为了进一步探讨我院所提出的优质护理方法的临床实际护理效果，从而为相关领域的研究提供借鉴依据。方法选取我院2012年8月～2013年8月期间普外科住院的患者368例为研究对象，进行了相关的比较研究。结果（1）两组患者实施不同临床护理措施后，优质护理组的184例患者实施护理后，总满意患者184例，总满意度为100.00%；常规护理组的184例患者实施护理后，总满意患者168例，总满意度为91.30%。总满意度组间比较，优质护理组患者的满意度显著高于常规护理患者的满意度，且差异具有统计学意义（x 2=16.73，P＜0.05）；（2）实施不同护理措施后，两组患者心理焦虑情况评分结果组间比较，优质护理组患者的得分水平显著的优于常规护理组患者的得分水平，差异具有统计学意义（t=3.14，P＜0.01）。结论在临床针对普外科患者实施临床护理实践的过程中，传统常规护理措施和方法相比较采用优质护理措施和方法的临床护理满意度情况更好，是临床针对普外科患者实施护理措施的理想选择。
目的：為瞭進一步探討我院所提齣的優質護理方法的臨床實際護理效果，從而為相關領域的研究提供藉鑒依據。方法選取我院2012年8月～2013年8月期間普外科住院的患者368例為研究對象，進行瞭相關的比較研究。結果（1）兩組患者實施不同臨床護理措施後，優質護理組的184例患者實施護理後，總滿意患者184例，總滿意度為100.00%；常規護理組的184例患者實施護理後，總滿意患者168例，總滿意度為91.30%。總滿意度組間比較，優質護理組患者的滿意度顯著高于常規護理患者的滿意度，且差異具有統計學意義（x 2=16.73，P＜0.05）；（2）實施不同護理措施後，兩組患者心理焦慮情況評分結果組間比較，優質護理組患者的得分水平顯著的優于常規護理組患者的得分水平，差異具有統計學意義（t=3.14，P＜0.01）。結論在臨床針對普外科患者實施臨床護理實踐的過程中，傳統常規護理措施和方法相比較採用優質護理措施和方法的臨床護理滿意度情況更好，是臨床針對普外科患者實施護理措施的理想選擇。
목적：위료진일보탐토아원소제출적우질호리방법적림상실제호리효과，종이위상관영역적연구제공차감의거。방법선취아원2012년8월～2013년8월기간보외과주원적환자368례위연구대상，진행료상관적비교연구。결과（1）량조환자실시불동림상호리조시후，우질호리조적184례환자실시호리후，총만의환자184례，총만의도위100.00%；상규호리조적184례환자실시호리후，총만의환자168례，총만의도위91.30%。총만의도조간비교，우질호리조환자적만의도현저고우상규호리환자적만의도，차차이구유통계학의의（x 2=16.73，P＜0.05）；（2）실시불동호리조시후，량조환자심리초필정황평분결과조간비교，우질호리조환자적득분수평현저적우우상규호리조환자적득분수평，차이구유통계학의의（t=3.14，P＜0.01）。결론재림상침대보외과환자실시림상호리실천적과정중，전통상규호리조시화방법상비교채용우질호리조시화방법적림상호리만의도정황경호，시림상침대보외과환자실시호리조시적이상선택。
Objective To further investigate the clinical practical nursing effect of the quality nursing methods proposed by our hospital, thus providing reference for relevant studies. Methods 368 patients hospitalized in the general surgery department of our hospital from August 2012 to August 2013 were selected as the study subjects and studied comparatively. Results (1)After the implementation of different clinical nursing measures, all the 184 patients of the quality nursing group were satisfied, with the total satisfaction rate of 100.00%; Of the 184 patients of the conventional nursing group, 168 patients were satisfied, with the total satisfaction rate of 91.30%. The quality nursing group had significantly higher satisfaction rate than the conventional nursing group, with statistically significant difference(x2=16.73, P < 0.05). (2)After the implementation of different nursing measures, the quality nursing group had significantly higher anxiety score than the conventional nursing group, with statistically significant difference(t=3.14, P<0.01). Conclusion In clinical nursing practice of the patients in general surgery department, quality nursing measures and methods show better clinical nursing satisfaction rate than conventional nursing measures and methods and therefore are ideal nursing options for the patients in clinical general surgery department.
