中国肿瘤临床
中國腫瘤臨床
중국종류림상
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2013年
16期
979-983
,共5页
黄超群%周云峰%谢丛华%杨肖军%程伏林%熊斌%杨国樑%李雁
黃超群%週雲峰%謝叢華%楊肖軍%程伏林%熊斌%楊國樑%李雁
황초군%주운봉%사총화%양초군%정복림%웅빈%양국량%리안
结直肠癌%细胞减灭术%腹腔热灌注化疗%腹膜癌
結直腸癌%細胞減滅術%腹腔熱灌註化療%腹膜癌
결직장암%세포감멸술%복강열관주화료%복막암
colorectal cancer%cytoreductive surgery%hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy%peritoneal carcinomatosis
目的:分析细胞减灭术(CRS)加术中腹腔热灌注化疗术(HIPEC)对结直肠癌腹膜转移癌的疗效及安全性。方法:课题设计为回顾性病例对照研究,收集结直肠癌腹膜转移癌(CRC PC)患者资料,按临床病理参数匹配原则,分为CRS组(CRS+术后全身化疗)29例,HIPEC组(CRS+HIPEC+术后全身化疗)33例。分析两组的总体生存期(OS)及严重不良事件(SAE)。结果:两组患者临床病理学特征均衡可比,术中PCI评分及器官/腹膜切除情况相似。两组中位随访时间分别为41.9个月(6.5~110.0个月)和32.0个月(10.5~95.9个月),OS分别为8.5个月(95%CI:4.9~12.1个月)和14.5个月(95%CI:11.9~17.1月)(P=0.007)。术后30天内CRS组3例发生SAE,HIPEC组9例(P=0.126)。多因素分析显示,HIPEC、CC 0~1分、术后化疗周期≥6个周期为改善生存的独立预后因素。结论:CRS+HIPEC可改善CRCPC患者生存期,SAE无显著增加,安全性可接受。
目的:分析細胞減滅術(CRS)加術中腹腔熱灌註化療術(HIPEC)對結直腸癌腹膜轉移癌的療效及安全性。方法:課題設計為迴顧性病例對照研究,收集結直腸癌腹膜轉移癌(CRC PC)患者資料,按臨床病理參數匹配原則,分為CRS組(CRS+術後全身化療)29例,HIPEC組(CRS+HIPEC+術後全身化療)33例。分析兩組的總體生存期(OS)及嚴重不良事件(SAE)。結果:兩組患者臨床病理學特徵均衡可比,術中PCI評分及器官/腹膜切除情況相似。兩組中位隨訪時間分彆為41.9箇月(6.5~110.0箇月)和32.0箇月(10.5~95.9箇月),OS分彆為8.5箇月(95%CI:4.9~12.1箇月)和14.5箇月(95%CI:11.9~17.1月)(P=0.007)。術後30天內CRS組3例髮生SAE,HIPEC組9例(P=0.126)。多因素分析顯示,HIPEC、CC 0~1分、術後化療週期≥6箇週期為改善生存的獨立預後因素。結論:CRS+HIPEC可改善CRCPC患者生存期,SAE無顯著增加,安全性可接受。
목적:분석세포감멸술(CRS)가술중복강열관주화료술(HIPEC)대결직장암복막전이암적료효급안전성。방법:과제설계위회고성병례대조연구,수집결직장암복막전이암(CRC PC)환자자료,안림상병리삼수필배원칙,분위CRS조(CRS+술후전신화료)29례,HIPEC조(CRS+HIPEC+술후전신화료)33례。분석량조적총체생존기(OS)급엄중불량사건(SAE)。결과:량조환자림상병이학특정균형가비,술중PCI평분급기관/복막절제정황상사。량조중위수방시간분별위41.9개월(6.5~110.0개월)화32.0개월(10.5~95.9개월),OS분별위8.5개월(95%CI:4.9~12.1개월)화14.5개월(95%CI:11.9~17.1월)(P=0.007)。술후30천내CRS조3례발생SAE,HIPEC조9례(P=0.126)。다인소분석현시,HIPEC、CC 0~1분、술후화료주기≥6개주기위개선생존적독립예후인소。결론:CRS+HIPEC가개선CRCPC환자생존기,SAE무현저증가,안전성가접수。
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in conjunction with hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treating patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods:A total of 62 CRC patients with complication of PC were divided into the CRS group, namely, Group One (n=29, CRS and systemic adju-vant chemotherapy) and the CRS+HIPEC group, namely, Group Two (n=33, CRS+HIPEC). The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS) and the secondary end point was serious adverse events (SAE). Results:Patients' clinicopathologic characteris-tics, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, and completeness of cytoreduction therapy were well balanced and comparable between the two groups. The median follow-up was 41.9 mo (6.5 mo to 110.0 mo) in Group One and 32.0 mo (10.5 mo to 95.9 mo) in Group Two. The median OS was 8.5 mo (95%CI:4.9 mo to 12.1 mo) in Group One and 14.5 mo (95%CI:11.9 mo to 17.1 mo) in Group Two (P=0.007). Within 30 days after the surgery, SAE occurred in 3 of the 29 patients in Group One, and 9 of the 33 patients in Group Two (P=0.126). Multivariate analysis revealed that HIPEC, CC0-1 score, and chemotherapy over six cycles were the independent factors for OS improvement. Conclusion:The CRS+HIPEC method improves the OS of patients with PC from CRC, suggesting an acceptable safety.