检验医学与临床
檢驗醫學與臨床
검험의학여림상
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE AND CLINICAL SCIENCES
2013年
16期
2084-2085
,共2页
联苯苄唑液%外耳道冲洗%真菌性外耳道炎%局部治疗
聯苯芐唑液%外耳道遲洗%真菌性外耳道炎%跼部治療
련분변서액%외이도충세%진균성외이도염%국부치료
bifonazole solution%external auditory canal irrigation%fungal inflammation of auditory canal%local treatment
目的探讨联苯苄唑液局部治疗真菌性外耳道炎的可行性,为临床治疗提供参考。方法选择2010年9月至2011年9月于该院诊治的真菌性外耳道炎患者40例,随机分成对照组和研究组,其中对照组20例单纯行常规外耳道冲洗,研究组20例联合联苯苄唑液冲洗治疗。随访1~2个月,对比两组患者的临床疗效、病情积分及不良反应发生情况。结果所有患者的病情积分均低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组间相比,研究组患者的病情积分优于对照组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);研究组患者治疗总有效率为95.0%,高于对照组的80.0%,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);研究组不良反应仅发生2例(10%),即轻度头晕1例、耳痒1例,研究组各种不良反应发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论采用联苯苄唑液局部联合治疗真菌性外耳道炎,可有效改善患者病情,临床疗效显著,且安全性高,值得推广使用。
目的探討聯苯芐唑液跼部治療真菌性外耳道炎的可行性,為臨床治療提供參攷。方法選擇2010年9月至2011年9月于該院診治的真菌性外耳道炎患者40例,隨機分成對照組和研究組,其中對照組20例單純行常規外耳道遲洗,研究組20例聯閤聯苯芐唑液遲洗治療。隨訪1~2箇月,對比兩組患者的臨床療效、病情積分及不良反應髮生情況。結果所有患者的病情積分均低于治療前,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);兩組間相比,研究組患者的病情積分優于對照組,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05);研究組患者治療總有效率為95.0%,高于對照組的80.0%,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05);研究組不良反應僅髮生2例(10%),即輕度頭暈1例、耳癢1例,研究組各種不良反應髮生率均低于對照組(P<0.05)。結論採用聯苯芐唑液跼部聯閤治療真菌性外耳道炎,可有效改善患者病情,臨床療效顯著,且安全性高,值得推廣使用。
목적탐토련분변서액국부치료진균성외이도염적가행성,위림상치료제공삼고。방법선택2010년9월지2011년9월우해원진치적진균성외이도염환자40례,수궤분성대조조화연구조,기중대조조20례단순행상규외이도충세,연구조20례연합련분변서액충세치료。수방1~2개월,대비량조환자적림상료효、병정적분급불량반응발생정황。결과소유환자적병정적분균저우치료전,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);량조간상비,연구조환자적병정적분우우대조조,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05);연구조환자치료총유효솔위95.0%,고우대조조적80.0%,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05);연구조불량반응부발생2례(10%),즉경도두훈1례、이양1례,연구조각충불량반응발생솔균저우대조조(P<0.05)。결론채용련분변서액국부연합치료진균성외이도염,가유효개선환자병정,림상료효현저,차안전성고,치득추엄사용。
Objective To observe the feasibility of local treatment of bifonazole solution on fungal inflamma-tion of auditory canal ,to provide the reference for the clinical treatment .Methods From September 2010 to Septem-ber 2011 ,40 cases with patients fungal inflammation of auditory canal were divided into control group and research group ,20 patients in each .Control group received conventional external auditory canal flushing ,and research group received flushing treatment combined with bifonazole solution .All the patients were followed up for 1~2 months . Clinical efficacy ,integration of illness and adverse drug reactions of the two groups were compared .Results After treatment ,the integration of illness for all patients were lower than before treatment (P<0 .05) .The integration of illness in research group was better than control group (P<0 .05) .The total effective rate of the research group was 95 .0% ,which was higher than 80 .0% of control group(P<0 .05) .And there was only two cases with adverse drug reactions in the research group(10% ) ,including 1 case with mild dizziness and another case with ear itching .The ad-verse drug reactions rate of research group was lower than that of the control group (P<0 .05) .Conclusion Apply-ing local treatment of bifonazole solution on fungal inflammation of auditory canal might effectively improve clinical efficacy ,which could be worthy of clinical and applicaton .