中外医学研究
中外醫學研究
중외의학연구
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
2013年
21期
16-16,17
,共2页
毛立科%孙全球%孙桂明%曹家军%楮小弟%徐军%落乐%孙自强
毛立科%孫全毬%孫桂明%曹傢軍%楮小弟%徐軍%落樂%孫自彊
모립과%손전구%손계명%조가군%저소제%서군%락악%손자강
腰椎间盘突出症%单椎板开窗减压%椎间盘切除%椎间融合%内固定
腰椎間盤突齣癥%單椎闆開窗減壓%椎間盤切除%椎間融閤%內固定
요추간반돌출증%단추판개창감압%추간반절제%추간융합%내고정
Prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc%Single decompression%Discectomy%Intervertebral fusion%Internal fixation
目的:观察单椎板减压椎间盘切除椎间植骨融合椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:对23例腰椎间盘突出症患者均行后路单椎板开窗减压椎间盘切除植骨融合内固定手术治疗且获得随访,其中单节段20例(L4~5或L5~S1),双节段3例(L4~5和L5~S1),按腰椎间盘突出症区域水平定位中央区2例,旁中央区8例,外侧区10例,极外侧区3例。术前、术后8~16个月随访时进行疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODl)评估和椎间隙相对高度(R)测量,观察植骨融合情况。结果:术前VAS、ODI及R分别为(8.8±0.5)分、(53.25±9.35)%、0.180±0.050、术后半年VAS、ODI及R分别为(1.9±0.6)分、(19.26±5.50)%、0.326±0.038,较术前均有明显改善(P<0.05)。术后1年椎体全部融合,融合率为100%,内固定物位置佳,无松动、脱出、折断等。结论:采用后路行单椎板开窗减压椎间盘切除椎间植骨椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎间盘突出症可获得良好效果。
目的:觀察單椎闆減壓椎間盤切除椎間植骨融閤椎弓根螺釘內固定治療腰椎間盤突齣癥的臨床療效。方法:對23例腰椎間盤突齣癥患者均行後路單椎闆開窗減壓椎間盤切除植骨融閤內固定手術治療且穫得隨訪,其中單節段20例(L4~5或L5~S1),雙節段3例(L4~5和L5~S1),按腰椎間盤突齣癥區域水平定位中央區2例,徬中央區8例,外側區10例,極外側區3例。術前、術後8~16箇月隨訪時進行疼痛視覺模擬評分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障礙指數(ODl)評估和椎間隙相對高度(R)測量,觀察植骨融閤情況。結果:術前VAS、ODI及R分彆為(8.8±0.5)分、(53.25±9.35)%、0.180±0.050、術後半年VAS、ODI及R分彆為(1.9±0.6)分、(19.26±5.50)%、0.326±0.038,較術前均有明顯改善(P<0.05)。術後1年椎體全部融閤,融閤率為100%,內固定物位置佳,無鬆動、脫齣、摺斷等。結論:採用後路行單椎闆開窗減壓椎間盤切除椎間植骨椎弓根螺釘內固定治療腰椎間盤突齣癥可穫得良好效果。
목적:관찰단추판감압추간반절제추간식골융합추궁근라정내고정치료요추간반돌출증적림상료효。방법:대23례요추간반돌출증환자균행후로단추판개창감압추간반절제식골융합내고정수술치료차획득수방,기중단절단20례(L4~5혹L5~S1),쌍절단3례(L4~5화L5~S1),안요추간반돌출증구역수평정위중앙구2례,방중앙구8례,외측구10례,겁외측구3례。술전、술후8~16개월수방시진행동통시각모의평분(VAS)、Oswestry공능장애지수(ODl)평고화추간극상대고도(R)측량,관찰식골융합정황。결과:술전VAS、ODI급R분별위(8.8±0.5)분、(53.25±9.35)%、0.180±0.050、술후반년VAS、ODI급R분별위(1.9±0.6)분、(19.26±5.50)%、0.326±0.038,교술전균유명현개선(P<0.05)。술후1년추체전부융합,융합솔위100%,내고정물위치가,무송동、탈출、절단등。결론:채용후로행단추판개창감압추간반절제추간식골추궁근라정내고정치료요추간반돌출증가획득량호효과。
Objective:To evaluate the curative effect of single decompression combined with discectomy,posterior intervertebral body fusion and pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc.Methods:Twenty-three patients with prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc were received comprehensive treatment of decompression,discectomy,posterior intervertebral body fusion and pedicle screw fixation,and followed up.In the study patients, 20 cases was 1-spinal cord (L4-5 or L5-S1),and 3 were 2-spinal cord (L4-5 or L5-S1).On the basis of the area of lumbar intervertebral disc,there were 2 central, 8 para-central,10 lateral and 3 far-lateral types cases in all patients.After operation,all patients were followed up from 8 to 16 months to perform the visual analogue scale(VAS),evaluate the oswestry disability index(ODl) and to examine the relative distance of intervertebral space(R).Notably,the interbody fusion status of each case was specially observed.Results:The statistical data revealed that the values of VAS,ODI and R were respectively 8.8±0.5,(53.25±9.35)%, 0.180±0.050 before operation.Six months following operation,the three periodontal index were respectively 1.9±0.6,(19.26±5.50)%,0.326±0.038,significantly improved relative to preoperation (P<0.05).One year after operation,the rate of fusion was 100%,without fixture rupturing or loosing.Conclusion:Combined treatment of prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc with decompression,discectomy,posterior intervertebral body fusion and pedicle screw fixation can get satisfactory clinical outcome.