中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2014年
16期
84-86
,共3页
整体护理%孕期保健%产科护理%满意度
整體護理%孕期保健%產科護理%滿意度
정체호리%잉기보건%산과호리%만의도
Holistic nursing%Health care during pregnancy%Obstetric care%Satisfaction degree
目的：研究整体护理对提高产科护理满意度的影响。方法：选取2013年4-9月在本院分娩的80例产妇，按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组各40例。对照组给予产科常规护理，观察组在常规护理的基础上定时授课进行孕期健康宣教，产期进行整体护理，观察并比较产妇妊娠期糖尿病（GDM）发生率、孕期保健知识掌握率、护理满意度、住院周期、SAS（Zung焦虑自评量表）评分和SDS（抑郁自评量表）评分。结果：观察组的妊娠合并症发生率为5.0%（2/40），对照组的妊娠合并症发生率为15.0%（6/40），比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；而观察组对孕期保健知识掌握率82.5%明显高于对照组的60.0%，且产妇对护理工作的满意率92.5%明显高于对照组的72.5%，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组住院周期（4.15±0.95）d明显短于对照组的（4.72±1.30）d，且SAS和SDS评分分别为（45.35±1.66）分、（46.35±1.61）分，均明显低于对照组的（46.13±1.74）分和（47.18±1.97）分，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：整体护理可以缩短住院周期，改善SAS评分及SDS评分，明显提高产妇保健知识掌握率及对产科护理的满意度，值得在临床上推广。
目的：研究整體護理對提高產科護理滿意度的影響。方法：選取2013年4-9月在本院分娩的80例產婦，按照隨機數字錶法將其分為對照組和觀察組各40例。對照組給予產科常規護理，觀察組在常規護理的基礎上定時授課進行孕期健康宣教，產期進行整體護理，觀察併比較產婦妊娠期糖尿病（GDM）髮生率、孕期保健知識掌握率、護理滿意度、住院週期、SAS（Zung焦慮自評量錶）評分和SDS（抑鬱自評量錶）評分。結果：觀察組的妊娠閤併癥髮生率為5.0%（2/40），對照組的妊娠閤併癥髮生率為15.0%（6/40），比較差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）；而觀察組對孕期保健知識掌握率82.5%明顯高于對照組的60.0%，且產婦對護理工作的滿意率92.5%明顯高于對照組的72.5%，差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）。觀察組住院週期（4.15±0.95）d明顯短于對照組的（4.72±1.30）d，且SAS和SDS評分分彆為（45.35±1.66）分、（46.35±1.61）分，均明顯低于對照組的（46.13±1.74）分和（47.18±1.97）分，差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論：整體護理可以縮短住院週期，改善SAS評分及SDS評分，明顯提高產婦保健知識掌握率及對產科護理的滿意度，值得在臨床上推廣。
목적：연구정체호리대제고산과호리만의도적영향。방법：선취2013년4-9월재본원분면적80례산부，안조수궤수자표법장기분위대조조화관찰조각40례。대조조급여산과상규호리，관찰조재상규호리적기출상정시수과진행잉기건강선교，산기진행정체호리，관찰병비교산부임신기당뇨병（GDM）발생솔、잉기보건지식장악솔、호리만의도、주원주기、SAS（Zung초필자평량표）평분화SDS（억욱자평량표）평분。결과：관찰조적임신합병증발생솔위5.0%（2/40），대조조적임신합병증발생솔위15.0%（6/40），비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；이관찰조대잉기보건지식장악솔82.5%명현고우대조조적60.0%，차산부대호리공작적만의솔92.5%명현고우대조조적72.5%，차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）。관찰조주원주기（4.15±0.95）d명현단우대조조적（4.72±1.30）d，차SAS화SDS평분분별위（45.35±1.66）분、（46.35±1.61）분，균명현저우대조조적（46.13±1.74）분화（47.18±1.97）분，차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：정체호리가이축단주원주기，개선SAS평분급SDS평분，명현제고산부보건지식장악솔급대산과호리적만의도，치득재림상상추엄。
Objective:To study the effect of holistic nursing care to improve nursing satisfaction.Method:80 parturients giving birth in our hospital were selected from April 2013 to September 2013,they were randomly divided the control group and the observation group,40 cases in each group.The control group was given routine obstetric care.The observation group was given health education during pregnancy time and holistic nursing care during perinatal period on the basis of the routine nursing care,The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus,the rate of receiving pregnancy care knowledge,satisfaction degree,hospitalization time,SAS score and SDS score between the two groups were observed and compared.Result:The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus of the observation group 5.0%(2/40),the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus of the control group was 15.0%(6/40),the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).The rate of receiving pregnancy care knowledge of the observation group was 82.5%,it was significantly higher than 60.0%of the control group,and maternal satisfaction rate of nursing work of the observation group was 92.5%,it was significantly higher than 72.5%of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The hospitalization time of the observation group was(4.15±0.95)d,it was significantly shorter than(4.72±1.30)d of the control group,and the SAS score and SDS score were(45.35±1.66)score,(46.35±1.61)score respectively,they were significantly lower than(46.13±1.74)score and(47.18±1.97)score of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Holistic nursing can shorten hospitalization period,improve the score of SAS and SDS score,significantly improve the rate of receiving pregnancy care knowledge and satisfaction degree,is worthy of clinical promotion.
