中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2014年
16期
150-150,152
,共2页
腘绳肌%柔韧性%静力牵伸
腘繩肌%柔韌性%靜力牽伸
객승기%유인성%정력견신
Hamstring muscle%Flexibility%Static stretching
目的：通过对腘绳肌持续性静力牵伸和间歇性静力牵伸两种牵拉方法的比较，探讨这两种牵拉方法对腘绳肌柔韧性的影响。方法：选取20例正常青年人，双侧下肢分别采用被动的持续性静力牵伸和间歇性静力牵伸法对腘绳肌进行比较。结果：两种牵伸方法牵拉前、后比较，差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)，两种方法间的比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论：对于提高腘绳肌的柔韧性，持续性静力牵伸法比间歇性静力牵伸法更有效。
目的：通過對腘繩肌持續性靜力牽伸和間歇性靜力牽伸兩種牽拉方法的比較，探討這兩種牽拉方法對腘繩肌柔韌性的影響。方法：選取20例正常青年人，雙側下肢分彆採用被動的持續性靜力牽伸和間歇性靜力牽伸法對腘繩肌進行比較。結果：兩種牽伸方法牽拉前、後比較，差異均有統計學意義(P＜0.05)，兩種方法間的比較差異具有統計學意義(P＜0.05)。結論：對于提高腘繩肌的柔韌性，持續性靜力牽伸法比間歇性靜力牽伸法更有效。
목적：통과대객승기지속성정력견신화간헐성정력견신량충견랍방법적비교，탐토저량충견랍방법대객승기유인성적영향。방법：선취20례정상청년인，쌍측하지분별채용피동적지속성정력견신화간헐성정력견신법대객승기진행비교。결과：량충견신방법견랍전、후비교，차이균유통계학의의(P＜0.05)，량충방법간적비교차이구유통계학의의(P＜0.05)。결론：대우제고객승기적유인성，지속성정력견신법비간헐성정력견신법경유효。
Objective:Through the comparison of application of continuous and intermittent static stretching for hamstring muscle, to explore the influence of the two pulling method on the flexibility of hamstring muscle.Methods:20 normal young men were selected.They were respectively given passive continuous and intermittent static stretching of bilateral lower extremity for hamstring muscle,and we compared the effect.Results:Two drafting methods before and after traction were statistically significant(P<0.05).Between the two methods,there was also statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:For improving the hamstring flexibility,persistence static stretching method is more efficient than intermittent static stretching.
