CAJ | 학술논문

为遏制“同案不同判”现象，最高人民法院建立了案例指导制度，并发布了一些指导性案例。经实证调研发现，刑事案例指导制度的实施情况不容乐观，其功能也未能充分发挥，其中包括法官工作繁忙无暇学习指导性案例、类似案件的判断标准缺失以及刑事指导性案例的效力模糊等原因。为此，应建立指导性案例数据库、加强法官培训、探索建立类似案件的判断标准、明确并赋予指导性案例以强制性约束力等。
위알제“동안불동판”현상，최고인민법원건립료안례지도제도，병발포료일사지도성안례。경실증조연발현，형사안례지도제도적실시정황불용악관，기공능야미능충분발휘，기중포괄법관공작번망무가학습지도성안례、유사안건적판단표준결실이급형사지도성안례적효력모호등원인。위차，응건립지도성안례수거고、가강법관배훈、탐색건립유사안건적판단표준、명학병부여지도성안례이강제성약속력등。
To eliminate the“identical cases having different verdicts” ,the Supreme Court established the Case Guidance System and released a number of guiding cases .The empirical research found that the im-plementation of the Criminal Case Guidance System was not optimistic ,and it did not work well .The reasons includes that judges are too busy to learning guiding cases ,lacking standards to judge the similar cases ,and the effectiveness of criminal guidance cases is vague .Therefore ,establishing guiding cases database ,training judges ,exploring the criteria for judging similar cases and enduing criminal guiding cases clearly mandatory binding are necessary .