江西医药
江西醫藥
강서의약
JIANGXI MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
4期
283-285
,共3页
罗荣光%况圣佳%黄立新%郭贵海%廖述利%舒虹%刘小红%钟嘉玮
囉榮光%況聖佳%黃立新%郭貴海%廖述利%舒虹%劉小紅%鐘嘉瑋
라영광%황골가%황립신%곽귀해%료술리%서홍%류소홍%종가위
肝肿瘤%TACE%TOCE%TAE%介入放射学
肝腫瘤%TACE%TOCE%TAE%介入放射學
간종류%TACE%TOCE%TAE%개입방사학
Liver tumor%TACE%TOCE%TAE%Interventional radiology
目的:评价经导管不同方案栓塞治疗对肝癌疗效的影响。方法收集我院2010年收治行经导管栓塞治疗的BCLC分期为A期或B期的肝癌患者44例,根据采用经动脉栓塞(TAE)、经动脉碘油化疗栓塞(TOCE)及联合采用TAE、TOCE及经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗将其分为TAE组、TOCE组及混合组。结果所有44例患者中入选TAE组21例,入选TOCE组15例,入选混合组8例,3组肝癌患者生存期的差异无统计学意义。结论经导管不同方案栓塞治疗对肝癌患者的生存期无明显影响。
目的:評價經導管不同方案栓塞治療對肝癌療效的影響。方法收集我院2010年收治行經導管栓塞治療的BCLC分期為A期或B期的肝癌患者44例,根據採用經動脈栓塞(TAE)、經動脈碘油化療栓塞(TOCE)及聯閤採用TAE、TOCE及經動脈化療栓塞(TACE)治療將其分為TAE組、TOCE組及混閤組。結果所有44例患者中入選TAE組21例,入選TOCE組15例,入選混閤組8例,3組肝癌患者生存期的差異無統計學意義。結論經導管不同方案栓塞治療對肝癌患者的生存期無明顯影響。
목적:평개경도관불동방안전새치료대간암료효적영향。방법수집아원2010년수치행경도관전새치료적BCLC분기위A기혹B기적간암환자44례,근거채용경동맥전새(TAE)、경동맥전유화료전새(TOCE)급연합채용TAE、TOCE급경동맥화료전새(TACE)치료장기분위TAE조、TOCE조급혼합조。결과소유44례환자중입선TAE조21례,입선TOCE조15례,입선혼합조8례,3조간암환자생존기적차이무통계학의의。결론경도관불동방안전새치료대간암환자적생존기무명현영향。
Objective To explore the effect of different transcatheter embolization therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma. Meth-ods Forty-four HCC patients with BCLC stage A or stage B were admitted to our hospital and treated by transcatheter emboliza-tion therapy in 2010. According to treated by transarterial embolization(TAE),transarterial oily chemoembolization (TOCE) or com-bined TAE,TOCE and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE),all 44 patients were divided into TAE group,TOCE group and mixed group. Results For all this 44 patients,there were 21 cases in TAE group,15 cases in TOCE group and 8 cases in mixed group,respectively. The survival had no significant difference among these 3 groups. Conclusion The type of transcatheter embolization therapy may be no obvious effect on patients survival.