CAJ | 학술논문

目的：循证医学PICOS模式与PBL教学法相结合的方式与传统教学方法进行对照研究。方法66例进入呼吸内科实习生被随机分为试验组(循证医学PICOS模式+PBL法)及对照组(传统教学法)。教学结束后两组同学同时进行考试考核。比较两组学生的呼吸内科考试卷面成绩及问卷调查结果分析。结果两组同学理论考试成绩差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但查阅文献、临床思维能力实验组高于对照组(P<0.05)。讨论临床思维及查阅文献能力循证医学PICOS模式结合PBL教学法明显优于传统教学法。
목적：순증의학PICOS모식여PBL교학법상결합적방식여전통교학방법진행대조연구。방법66례진입호흡내과실습생피수궤분위시험조(순증의학PICOS모식+PBL법)급대조조(전통교학법)。교학결속후량조동학동시진행고시고핵。비교량조학생적호흡내과고시권면성적급문권조사결과분석。결과량조동학이론고시성적차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。단사열문헌、림상사유능력실험조고우대조조(P<0.05)。토론림상사유급사열문헌능력순증의학PICOS모식결합PBL교학법명현우우전통교학법。
Objective To try to use evidence-based medicine PICOS model with PBL teaching method and traditional teaching methods to control study. Methods 66 cases into the respiratory medicine interns were randomly divided into experimental group (PICOS mode of evidence-based medicine (ebm)+PBL method) and the control group (traditional teaching method). After teaching two groups of students at the same time to test. Comparison of the two groups of students took respiratory medicine examination result and the result of questionnaire analysis. Results There was no significant difference theory of two groups of students examination results (P>0.05). But the literature, clinical thinking ability, experimental group was higher than the control group (P<0.05). Discuss clinical thinking and the ability of evidence-based medicine through the literature PICOS model combining+PBL teaching method is superior to the traditional teaching method.