中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版)
中華實驗和臨床感染病雜誌(電子版)
중화실험화림상감염병잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2013年
5期
661-664
,共4页
杨婧%张彭%褚美玲%马均%任微%于静波%薛文成
楊婧%張彭%褚美玲%馬均%任微%于靜波%薛文成
양청%장팽%저미령%마균%임미%우정파%설문성
碳青霉烯酶%肺炎克雷伯菌%耐药表型
碳青黴烯酶%肺炎剋雷伯菌%耐藥錶型
탄청매희매%폐염극뢰백균%내약표형
Carbapenemases%Klebsiella pneumoniae%Phenotype of resistance
目的:本研究旨在探讨自动细菌鉴定药敏仪器对碳青霉烯非敏感肺炎克雷伯菌株的检测效果,并对其实用性、可靠性做出初步评价。方法采用改良Hodge试验对菌株进行产碳青霉烯酶筛选,同时与常规药敏实验筛选的可能产碳青霉烯酶实验菌株对照,对可疑菌株进行相关耐药基因PCR扩增、测序,以此结果作为标准来判断上述试验的敏感性和特异性。结果研究期间临床共检出87株可疑产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌菌株,经Hodge试验初筛、PCR扩增证实产KPC酶的菌株40株,待测序确认6株;无VIM和IMP基因型;VITEK2专家系统提示碳青霉烯酶表型的敏感性87.0%,特异性92.7%。结论 VITEK2自动药敏鉴定仪因其对低水平耐药的产碳青霉烯酶菌株检测效果欠佳,敏感性和特异性不高,在筛选产碳青霉烯酶菌株时需谨慎使用。
目的:本研究旨在探討自動細菌鑒定藥敏儀器對碳青黴烯非敏感肺炎剋雷伯菌株的檢測效果,併對其實用性、可靠性做齣初步評價。方法採用改良Hodge試驗對菌株進行產碳青黴烯酶篩選,同時與常規藥敏實驗篩選的可能產碳青黴烯酶實驗菌株對照,對可疑菌株進行相關耐藥基因PCR擴增、測序,以此結果作為標準來判斷上述試驗的敏感性和特異性。結果研究期間臨床共檢齣87株可疑產碳青黴烯酶肺炎剋雷伯菌菌株,經Hodge試驗初篩、PCR擴增證實產KPC酶的菌株40株,待測序確認6株;無VIM和IMP基因型;VITEK2專傢繫統提示碳青黴烯酶錶型的敏感性87.0%,特異性92.7%。結論 VITEK2自動藥敏鑒定儀因其對低水平耐藥的產碳青黴烯酶菌株檢測效果欠佳,敏感性和特異性不高,在篩選產碳青黴烯酶菌株時需謹慎使用。
목적:본연구지재탐토자동세균감정약민의기대탄청매희비민감폐염극뢰백균주적검측효과,병대기실용성、가고성주출초보평개。방법채용개량Hodge시험대균주진행산탄청매희매사선,동시여상규약민실험사선적가능산탄청매희매실험균주대조,대가의균주진행상관내약기인PCR확증、측서,이차결과작위표준래판단상술시험적민감성화특이성。결과연구기간림상공검출87주가의산탄청매희매폐염극뢰백균균주,경Hodge시험초사、PCR확증증실산KPC매적균주40주,대측서학인6주;무VIM화IMP기인형;VITEK2전가계통제시탄청매희매표형적민감성87.0%,특이성92.7%。결론 VITEK2자동약민감정의인기대저수평내약적산탄청매희매균주검측효과흠가,민감성화특이성불고,재사선산탄청매희매균주시수근신사용。
Objective To evaluate the effect of automated bacterial identification system to identify carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates and to make a preliminary evaluation of its practicality and reliability. Methods Total of 87 K. pneumoniae isolates with reduced susceptibility to carbapenems were evaluated. Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed by VITEK2. The carbapenemase resistance phenotype of the isolates resistant to carbapenem was screened by modified Hodge test and identified by VITEK2 automated microbial identification and susceptibility instrument. The carbapenemase-encoding genes were identified by PCR and amplicon sequencing. Results Among 87 isolates, 40 isolates were determined as KPC positive by PCR, 6 isolates were waiting for confirmation by sequencing. There was no VIM or IMP gene. Based on the results of PCR, the sensitivity and specificity value for “flagging” a likely carbapenemase was 87.0% and 92.7% by VITEK 2, respectively. Conclusions The sensitivity and specificity of VITEK2 to identify the carbapenemases was not high, due to its poor detection for low-level resistant carbapenemase isolates. This means the method should be used cautiously.